Siegelspokeoffering a new explanation as to how the virus spread so quickly from China to several other countries. Dr. Siegel went out of his way to emphasize that heis not aexpert in the field of respiratory medicine–he’sadoctorsatCleveland Clinicandhe’sas a medical student in the past. For Siegel,the primary cause is a viralinfection that appears to be directly related to somebacteria. Dr. Siegel explains as to why many of the people infectedin the US are not infected by the virus commonly found in the nose. While Dr. Siegel believes thatthis virus can easily slip through the membrane to other parts of the body andmaybe transmitted through coughing, sneezing, etc. – it’s a disease that’s not very widespread as of yet. Siegel says the virus,or at least a part of it, seems to originate in Wuhan, and traveled to three other counties in China between 2008 and 2011. When asked to speculate on who may carry the virus, Dr. Siegel said: “We have somereason to believe the virus that appears to originate in China is spreading in other countries as well.” Dr. Siegel explained that Chinese scientistshave discovered a number of new virus strains in thepast few years, andthat they’re all associated withobesity. Dr. Siegel also added that Chinese scientists found a new form ofthe virus in people infected twice andfurther infected them as time went on. Since the scientists discovered the new virus back in 2011, theChina Ministry of Health has been monitoring the incidence rateof this epidemic. Dr. Siegel explained that the virus that appeared to originate in China is known tobedifferent to many other viralallergies, and has aspecificmolecular structure that requiresa differentinteractionwith the respiratorychemicalsin thehuman body. That’s why Chinese workers infected with the virus weretreated using a different type oftherapy as soon as they emerged from the virus. Dr. Siegel believes that some of these workers became infected withinfection early on after theyreferred to their patients as sick and were offered some medications to make them feel better. Dr. Siegel wasalso asked byTucker Carlson to explain theinfection process for the five people who hadbeen admitted to theUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center that havebeen identified in theUnited States as being infected with the coronavirus. Dr. Siegel explains how they were exposed to theinfection on the Shanghai train: “They are doingtest tube experimentation, so they did this inChina. They did this in Shanghai to see if there was a treatment that worked, and afterthey found that thiswas effective, theyused this to test how long they could delay the exposure and treatthem. You have two patients who were treated after the twowere exposed–one of the ones was treated within this time frame so the timing of the treatment andthe exposure is different. The other patient was treated fortwo weeks before he got a treatment.

“These two patients had come in on the Shanghai train.”

Siegel was asked how much of a problem it really is that 5 people fromtheUnited States were infected –and thusmayalso beinfected withmultiple airborne viruses and diseases. While Dr. Siegel suggested there isquite a problem with the numbers of people beinginfectedwith airborne strains of the coronavirus, he added that infectionor exposurewith a virus that has evolved in a different way is not common. Dr. Siegel described it as “quite aproblem”.

Tucker Carlson asked Dr. Siegel to explain thetoxins of the virus. Siegel said the virus “is known to cause liver failure in mice, as well as other toxicities, including liver disease. “I don’t have the numbers to support that,” says Dr. Siegel, “but that’s what the results look like.” So how did things get so bad in China? Dr. Siegel explains, “China has been producing more than 15,000 tons ofcoconut oil since the 1960s…they’vebeen churning out more than3 million tons of it in a given year”, and now they’retrying to make somethingthat’s in the same ballpark of our butter. Dr.Siegel went on to emphasize that this virus developed “almost instantaneously” in China, and itarose withinjust two days of theSichuanoil/coconut oil pipeline starting up

He said that China remains one of the world’s leading surveillance operations, with a special focus on U.S. companies that build and operate U.S. networks. The U.S. does not release data or information about China’s efforts, he said.

If this was a government operation, then it shouldn’t have much of a place in the public debate, the commissioner said. The Commission oversees the nation’s communications, including telecommunications, and the privacy and civil liberties issues involved are well known in private, but now are taking center stage when it comes to the Commission.

Barry Schwartz, senior vice president of the wireless carrier Nextel, said: “In the United States, we’re not doing anything very unusual with our operations. At the same time I think it’s important that there is transparency.”

U.S. tech companies, including Nokia, Google, Facebook and Amazon, are part of a special U.S. government project to prevent the spread of hacking, the FCC’s Crawford said on Friday night in a speech at a telecommunications conference in Washington. “And you can see there are more countries – China, Russia, Taiwan, India – that are developing sophisticated cyber capabilities,” he said.

“… China has been one of the world leaders in cyber espionage and cyber-espionage for decades now. So why have they not gotten the same treatment from the United States?” he said.

In response to the commission’s speech, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce denounced the FCC’s stance and called it “irresponsible and an embarrassment.”

It’s a social and sometimes sexual stigma that means people don’t want to see men who have children as people of lesser status.

How can they work in private practice or to gain other skills? Even if we do believe there are benefits from having children of different sex (which there may be), it’s a huge stretch to pretend that it’s no bigger a challenge for some to balance their life-blood with family life than it is for someone of the same sex. It’s not a problem for the same reasons it’s no problem for a person of any sex to have his lifeblood tested.

As more couples have children, it may become less normal. But isn’t that kind of the point? We’re trying to encourage couples, even those working in the same clinic, to continue to create healthier families without compromising their own lives.

That takes time and resources. But when we focus on “gender” in our policies and programs for both people with children and men and women struggling with family problems, we are making things worse.

We must encourage people to work on the issues. If they don’t, they will end up hurting themselves or their family. If people like me want to help them become healthy families, we need to give men and women who have children the same opportunities we offer people going through the same issues, but with a different emphasis on what’s good for them, and what’s good for the whole. We can help them take charge of a healthy family with someone they love, regardless of their gender.

I’m not alone in feeling like this needs to change. I have had family discussions with my children that reveal the frustration for many in the transgender community. I’ve seen their faces light up as they recount all the things in the life-blood that are important to them, that are essential to the well-being of their family, and how wonderful it’s been to see their peers succeed and to have a sense of purpose in their lives. But I am seeing people like my daughters and son. I’m seeing them struggle to see the world as their own.

As you can see, if there is a positive view of children in the “special needs” program at the clinic, it must be based on a positive assumption about parenting. A life-blood that can be managed with a minimum of hassle and time should not be considered a liability, because we all know people don’t want to see a kid with a serious medical illness in a wheelchair. A life-blood that is not required to bring attention to a child should be a tool to support the family, not a means to avoid something that will most likely never happen again.

It doesn’t need to be about your own sexual orientation. It needs to be about the child’s health.

I did a quick list and there were five more titles, and after five quick phone calls to each author (the “queen of suspense,” who would be “king of suspense” if not for a lack of good titles). I asked for each title if someone I knew enjoyed my blog and some of them agreed to my request for a review. Not a single one of them had ever reviewed or published a book! In one day!

So by the time this blog was published I had received over 130 letters. I did some research on the author to make sure that he (or she) was indeed, an “author” with a website, though he may be simply the same name as that of a former member or one of my Facebook friends. All authors have multiple websites and I tried with all honesty to find a link back to a website I could visit when reading an author’s book (because I will be using it to research more books, and if I have to go to the main site directly, I can click the “Links to Other Websites” link to go to an alternative). It seems that this author has not published any of his books elsewhere. While trying to do research on this, I discovered that he seems to have a long time of online experience, that he is not a regular poster of his own journal, that he is a bit of an active member of the paranormal community, and that he has a collection of at least one well-known ghost story, written for a pulp magazine. There were also some “other” books listed, some of which were similar to other “best sellers” that he had written.

I was in a bad mood at this point because I wanted to go home. And I just had to get one of my own “best sellers”! So I checked the titles on Amazon and Google Books. Not one of the five that were mentioned claimed that they could write other books. Well, of course, those days are long gone, that’s all they were. We have books sold more easily in this blog than in stores, but you will get very few, if any (if any) “best sellers” from most of them. So that was my task, and I knew right away that it was the most difficult thing I have ever done in my life. It took 3 days and I could not get to sleep for a very long time. I still remembered what I did when I was younger and remember how I tried every little thing that worked to give me a “good night’s sleep”.

At one point, a lady called from her husband who was a farmer. The call wasn’t for a farmer specifically, she said someone who had problems with his farm. She said, “I’m a reporter from the AP with the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and I have a very good piece you might like” And I remember running over to her house, having her tell me what was going on. And just as I was about to have a drink with her about how badly her article was doing, she ran out the door shouting “I want to tell your son, my son, not the media here!!!” “But what about your son who’s in prison?”, I wanted to say to her as I realized that it was about her husband and his family. “My son is a reporter and he has a story of his own” and I walked away. This was what this blog was about. It was a chance for this writer to tell her story, no matter if she was an author or a blogger, and she was doing a good job at it. However, the more I thought about it, all the more I wanted to say, “that sounds kind of sad.” So the next day, as she was getting ready to leave, a friend of hers called and said, “What about a story about my husband’s farm. I have read a great piece about your farm, about how he had problems with people harassing him for farming and that led to this.” And I told my friend that I just can’t see how a guy with a farm that has been plagued with crimes (mostly murder by farm workers) could do better than “about a farm,” the “farmers only.” She says, “well, I do have a story about your husband, I just don’t know what it is.” I explained all that had happened, she then said, “okay that sounds great, I’ve always wanted to hear about this farm and have you tell the story.”

“okay” was my feeble answer, “but can I go through the book right now?” And I went down to the library and did that. And as I read the books, I asked myself why I didn’t try that myself earlier. All you have to do is use Google, go to their websites, and even do a search on the titles to see if they have ever appeared in a best seller list. I found that as you read about the “farmers only” story, all the

Three of the five workers are in isolation as opposed to the standard two to three days, an extremely rare practice. They have not been put on the highest level of isolation, with only the most carefully trained personnel. One nurse who is being monitored in her office said the hospital does not want to let anybody else go anywhere without an administrator there to protect them. She said “We’ve been asked not to leave our office.” Other employees at the hospital said that a nurse has been told to not touch her patient with any object. The worker has been informed, “Your family is in the hospital so you need to stay close to them and watch your temperature all the time.” This is part of an all out attempt to keep the workers as quiet as possible, so they may not alert anyone that they are there and, worse for them, can potentially spread the infection. Most of those who work in this field in the U.S. and elsewhere seem to be very relaxed and very friendly. They are very happy that they work in a sanitized, safe environment. There is some evidence that a large proportion of the “sanitized” jobs are really not as clean as they are advertised. The “cleaner” is almost always not the person carrying it out of the room.

We were sent photos early last week of what appeared to be a person on the floor of a treatment center in Dallas in a very strange manner. There actually appears to have been a human. A physician looked at the X-rays and thought it was someone infected with the virus but was unable to do anything. The photos were not of any of the patients but were of a huge room in the facility where the workers and visitors were being treated. The workers are using “air mattresses,” air mattresses with a metal frame around the middle, a very nice touch. It is not apparent if it is “the air mattress” or some type of plastic mattress they use for many medical care settings.

In this new kind of sanitized patient room in a room full of medical technicians using a plastic mattress. There were many of these around the hospital.

A hospital in the San Francisco Bay Area has started ordering air mattresses in large numbers. They have sold $100,000 in new ones. They are being paid to use. What kind of air mattresses do they need for these patients. I’ve seen plenty of pictures of the air mattresses but they do show how clean the patient room in a hospital is, except of course for the patient. No blood on the floor, no vomit on the walls, etc. No visible scabs or sores, no exposed sores on the skin, or the patient. All of that except the person. They are not looking at the person, they are looking at the mattress. What we will see is a normal person, not a patient with an infected or contagious illness.

“It’s always better to be naked in the middle of a crowded room (or a room full of medical staff) than to be naked and exposed in the hallway outside.” – Dr. William Schaffner, MD

These air mattresses are not very clean. They are made of a material that has been in use for as long as human history and is not intended to be replaced and cleaned. They are also very expensive - $1,600 a “unit”. The cost to the hospital, $100,000 for a new unit. There will be enough air mattresses in the hospital to provide bedding for about 180,000 beds and staff is being paid for putting on a mattress, not cleaning it. Another strange thing from the photos is the plastic of the mattress frame. The frame is made of something called a “Nodal Fiber” a composite material made from fibers of plastics. The frame will be reused in different sizes at different times, thus eventually the plastic can break down. It is unknown just what has been inside of the frames for quite some time, because of the material’s age. It is an old material that was used long before the early medical treatments and has been kept, as a medical material, for quite some time. They also want to make the entire plastic a part of the new unit. According to the website here the hospital currently has an “Ace of Spades” ranking system in place that allows the hospital to give grants to medical schools for their medical students that want to practice in California. The Medical Schools have agreed to a partnership deal for a certain number of slots in California and can use those grants to pay for living and school expenses for each student. The doctors at the hospital were all asked to sign a contract “agreeing” not to speak to Dr. Schaffner or a former employee of their hospital or to share any video or related media of the medical facility or

“ The astronauts survived the first day and a half of their mission and were all said to be so confident they were almost ready to fly again that during a preflight routine test, they had prepared a press conference to tell their stories. So far, there’s also nothing to suggest any criminal infractions during the mission. And if it had been up to NASA and its engineers and scientists, the astronauts who escaped Earth today would be celebrating their freedom back in America,” Cavuto added.

What’s not to love? Why go to all the trouble of getting them out alive anyway? (A couple days after the accident, the U.S. government banned commercial airline and commercial space travel due to the risks of falling into the unforgiving inner Earth, which can be 100 times more dense than the International Space Station and as much as 40,000 times higher than the deepest point in our orbit, the Moon.) And, the “futuristic “ Moon-lander astronauts don’t have to worry about carrying extra equipment. “After the initial blast off, the astronauts were flown to a remote mountain that was already familiar to them from previous missions. They did not have to make any further connections.”

Some might also argue that they didn’t need to send a return capsule back with them into space, because there’s no known technology to prevent microgravity from destroying a craft like the Voyager. “No technology is in place to provide to a small craft going in space any form of life support in its orbit. There is none. So even if a return is made, it will be for about 30 minutes,” the report said. “So the crew members would be safe for about an hour.”

“And if NASA does make contingency plans for a return to Earth, it would be almost a suicide mission.” That’s where you have NASA’s chief advocate for the idea of a returning lunar colony, Ellen Ochoa, director and founder of San Francisco based nonprofit Solar Habitat Research Project (SHARP). This is the agency’s project to produce a commercial, self-sustaining moon base in orbit around the Moon. The idea has been kicked around for years, and NASA has talked about building a permanent base somewhere or other in deep space if NASA could somehow prove its viability, said Ochoa. That’s because many people are dying each year just from the high radiation levels.

“That’s why humanity needs a long-term permanent space habitation,” she said. “We need to expand our horizons and experience the Moon as a place for human habitation. We need to take a lunar life as an opportunity to learn, grow, and learn again,” she said. “And for me, the biggest challenge to this is the fact that when you talk about doing something like these [Moonbase] experiments in deep space as opposed to low-earth orbit, there’s the fact with all the radiation levels you have you’re not going to be able to get some people up and out to a place that’s just as safe as you can get up here on earth.”

This is more or less the same logic the NASA director Charles Bolden has been pushing for. He’s advocating for developing that lunar base out of lunar regolith (the lunar soil) but keeping in mind that you could only support a base or settlement of one person. “The first step would be to get enough lunar rocks to build an experiment. And then we will have an idea and not from anybody of why we should go to the Moon to do that,” he told Bloomberg News in 2014, shortly before his term was about to end. “And then there will be a longer follow-up plan, with a real return to the lunar surface to do some science and then follow-up to have all that land turned into a base for somebody.” The plan sounds like it would lead to the building of a colony very, very quickly: “In the course of a couple of decades we would have a lunar colony working on some form of lunar ecosystem, working on a human settlement.” This is also not the same as the idea of permanently orbiting an isolated colony in order to provide it with life support and the supplies required to stay hydrated and fed.

In April, NASA announced a $30 million investment into a self-sustaining lunar base concept. It’s called Lunar Habitat . To be competitive, it would have to generate enough electricity to keep a small city functioning, a good mix of resources, and the ability to expand. As of September 27th, the project had raised more than $23.5 million. But the news made no mention of Ochoa’s proposal, so it’s hard to tell what her own position is. Given what she said, it would seem that she thinks the Moon needs more, not less, people in it. It stands to reason she may get a boost from her own organization. In a statement from Solar Habitat Research, Ochoa said, “Solar Habitat offers a sustainable and stable environment for a colony.

I’d be lying if I said that had never happened to me. He was still on me when I got to the other side and I don’t remember what I did, but I think I took a swig out of my pool water to hide from his attentions. I don’t remember much about this guy, but I remember all of the times I’ve been up there with him. I don’t remember if I ever ran but I do remember I was always up there.”

“I didn’t think I was gonna see it coming.” It was the first time Kristal could remember hearing such a thing and she almost couldn’t believe what she was hearing. She began to cry.

“I’m not gonna lie I was kinda scared about what was going to happen to me. Then I remembered I was wearing my pajamas and it was raining and she needed me, and I needed her too so I just jumped. It was so funny, like the worst thing could have happened to me, but I was with her and was all wrapped up in my pajamas. So I just jumped in and took off. I told a bunch of people I was crying hysterically. My brain just froze. I just kept saying, “It’s gonna be okay.” I was so caught up in myself. I said it over and over, I swear on my life, I told all my best friends, I told the bar girl. It’s been that way ever since. And that wasn’t the only time.”

( I was told so many times that I should stop crying but I’d just continue trying to tell people. I remember, I remember crying so much before I started asking the questions. I remember crying in the shower)

( I remember a woman’s voice, and it was one I couldn’t forget. But I couldn’t stop crying just to make it stop. What was she planning? Why did she let me go? In the bathroom I felt someone’s hand on my shoulder and I tried to turn my head but his arm went round. What did she want me to do? She said, “I’m coming with you.” As if I could have stopped crying anyway, but I couldn’t. We were going to take off like that and find the nearest bathroom to the pool and get the hell out of there before it came to that.

“You’re going to tell me you didn’t think?”

( I don’t know if I’ll ever be able to look her in the eye again. I have no feeling for her beyond sympathy. Who am I supposed to take for a friend? I don’t know. It’s going to be a really long day. And every day is going to be even longer without my daughter.” ( Kristal is going to be so sorry.

As the clouds rolled in behind a heavy, dark sky, there was no onenot the men or the women

The news comes along with a video that’s worth seeing.

Now back to the release timeframe.

The following is sourced from Nintendo’s Investor Relations website , an area typically reserved for the company’s most recent, most anticipated releases.

On July 25, 2018, we will release our latest title, the title you all know and love! With that said, the new details to come with the game won’t be released until our next quarterly financials are released.

Thanks to Nintendo Financials for allowing us an early glimpse at that, as that should have come straight out of the mouth of the CEO.

To further help understand the nature of Street Fighter V: Champion Edition , here is a little more from the latest quarterly filing.

“Street Fighter V Champion Edition The following details relate to a sequel to Street Fighter V for the Nintendo Switch. The Nintendo Switch version of Street Fighter V will contain new gameplay features and story elements. New game modes include 4 versus 1, team battles and tournaments, as well as online gameplay. As part of its new online gameplay, in addition to the usual online features, the Nintendo Switch version of Street Fighter V will also allow players to play the game in a similar way to how they view Street Fighter V without sacrificing the depth of gameplay in order to enjoy it on the go.”

I guess the title has a new multiplayer mode - maybe a matchmaker system for those of us on the go?

We will have to wait and see, but I can’t wait to see the new Street Fighter V .

Are you excited for the game? Let us know in the comments!

He bought a tech company that was about to run out of gas, and he sold its shares too soon. They sold off to some other buyer, who in turn sold them to another buyer who in turn… ummm… he sells them to someone else. He may well have been smart enough to realize that the best way to become a billion dollar investor is to have a multi-billion dollar company, as much as anyone in the Universe. With the stock price so cheap, he thought, he’d be able to put his personal money in and buy stocks along the way. But he is the CEO of a $70 billion company, and they aren’t buying everything he touches… they’re buying everything he touches. That’s the smart thing to do, not a dumb thing to do.

The problem is that it doesn’t work very well. Here’s what I mean.

The best part about Elon Musk is that he’s still running something, even if it isn’t as successful as he had planned. And that helps us understand the need for a fundamental change in investor investing. I’m sure he’d agree that being wrong in the sense of being profitable is ok, but not being able to turn your company into the world’s next great energy company is not. If he can make solar cheaper, more efficient, and allow the market to decide, then it is still great company to be, even if the numbers are a bit shaky. But even if they couldn’t, he would not be able to drive the price down any further. If solar is even half as efficient and half as affordable as he says it will be at the end of his time, he will have no financial incentive to make the switch, and so his motivation is going to be much weaker than it ordinarily would be, because the decision was already made.

So here is what I, and many others in my field, have been suggesting. It is this:

You, the investor, are the boss. No, it is not your company. The company has no business or personal involvement in your decision-making. And no, you cannot go “down the road” in ways a non-executive knows little about, because your job depends on your relationship with the company.

The point is that shareholders are simply another customer. Don’t feel obligated to buy every single piece of stock you see that is down in prices. You have the right to do that, but you should not have to make it a requirement. Keep your ears and your eyes open for opportunities to invest in a company that’s been successful enough that you’re not just looking for stock value gain, but also the chance to see if this CEO can create value too. He may well have done so already, even if you don’t recognize it at this stage. He may also have done so a year ago, if your company invested a significant amount of money in an early stage company that is no longer in production, and is just as profitable and profitable now. So the point about management of your business is not that it’s required, but rather that it is a part of the equation .

The simple fact is that stock ownership is not an impediment to performance… for most companies . It is a part of the calculation. I am not sure how it can be otherwise if you have this kind of stock, but they are pretty darn common.

You also don’t have to get on the board just to have voting rights at the company. I have yet to hear of anyone who owned 10% of a company who did not actually have some stake in the company, and even some that held more than 10% were only given votes and did not benefit from the company’s wealth.

And in fact, I think you should be able to own more than 1% of a company if you choose. If you don’t like the way a company behaves, or the way a CEO handles his job, or even the type of person you would like to see running the company, then just own a stockholder stake when you buy the shares. If you already own one and don’t mind voting, not using that as an excuse to stay out of the decision process, then go for it. But I don’t think you should get your hopes up on doing things if they don’t seem possible to you, or you feel you have no reason not to.

How to have a conversation about how to create a market that is more fair for everyone? I’ve known some of these companies who have made moves in this direction, and I feel like they are slowly creating a market that’s less inequitable than the one they were created to prevent. I’m not trying to make it sound like companies are making the whole world go ‘round in ways that

So that is good news. “In recent years, we have seen an abundance of innovation, so we are moving into a new phase,” Mr. McElman said. “We have added investment to our business across all our vertical markets.” Mr. McElman says they have made significant progress in moving into the high-cost e-commerce era.

The move comes as online shopping continues to grow globally.

“The biggest players in our industry, Amazon and eBay, are moving into a more aggressive mode,” said Jeff McElman, who is chairman of the consumer-electronics equipment maker. “At the same time, we are doing more and more business that will take up space on our website and into our shopping carts. But we believe we can compete on pricing, availability and value in all our vertical markets, not just in the U.S., but even in our biggest customer areas.”

Cost savings should start coming into evidence this year, Mr. McElman said. “We have been doing some cost-reduction in equipment, and in some cases we have cut materials even further in order to make equipment more cost-effective and make the manufacturing process easier.” An online retailer needs to be able to offer an assortment of products of different quality levels. And that’s where Mr. McElman has some competitors. “Amazon is at an advantage. They have a much more extensive product line, and they have more customers that are trying to take advantage of it.” Mr. McElman plans to spend the next six months building a customer list that includes large retailers and consumer-electronics buyers such as Dixons, RBC Capital Markets, Aon and Cimavax. Amazon was acquired in 2010 for $1.5 billion.

“Our focus now is on growing online sales, and it will continue to be a very important part of the business,” said Eric Haverstock, general counsel for Amazon, Inc. “It took time to grow from the beginning, but it is growing now and will become even larger as we add new store locations.”

– In a speech at the Boston Economic Council , Mike Konczal says there are signs of an online retail revolution. He said the recent growth in online sales has sparked a frenzy in buying and shipping of products, with “the new normal of getting on the Internet and buying stuffthat was just unthinkable in 2003.” He says that while there are some risks, this isn’t a bubble, the next bubble we’re concerned about is an “information market bubble.” Here’s more about Mike’s forecast for the next six months: The Internet is changing the shopping and shipping behaviors of millions of Americans, creating an information revolution. What is occurring is a “shift to information as commerce.” But the biggest change: A new class of consumers is being formed, “a first- to fifth-generation of Americans with the skills and knowledge to shop and manage their shopping data” in an Internet-driven economy. “If you’re an executive or owner of an investment firm, you may be feeling very different now than you did a year ago when you got a call that the stock market was falling. For them, it looks as though the tide is finally turning.” This phenomenon doesn’t require any sort of new technologythere’s just the knowledge, skills and information to do the necessary shopping and shipping. I’m not an expert in this (maybe even a skeptic), but it sounds real I’m also not an advocate of the “information market,” although the details that Mike discusses in his talk are helpful. So I’ll probably be more skeptic of this than Mike or others will be.

                            • The “new normal” of buying and shipping that Mr. Konczal describes is certainly not what the big box store is used to. According to the same BESC report , it takes over three days to ship a consumer’s item from the point of purchase to the customer. And while most big box stores are still the most popular retail spots for groceries, they are becoming more and more popular for high-priced products for e-liquids, furniture, gadgets and many other retail purchases. I’m curious to hear your thoughts. As for Mike Konczal going into an “information market” bubble: that’s a real “bubble,” one that we should not expect to survive. But I guess Mike has never actually been to my local big box shop.
Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now