They claim that the monkeys cannot detect what they have done and their genes are in short supply.

The researchers believe that the primate brains are in a world of uncertainty as to what they have actually done and whether any special human can ever have control over and alter their behavior, something that has recently become a core of their work. The paper, of course, is by a company called Brain Lab Research and Development.

What the authors of the paper write:

To determine if primate brains have been programmed to detect new signals or a change in their genetic codes, we examined the brain samples obtained by our sonar scanner (at Chinese institute “brain lab”) for three primate brains belonging to species B. rex, P. reticulatus, and B. montanthus. The primates were exposed to a range of light, sound, sound, and radio frequencies to determine the presence of a novel neural signal. In the middle of the experiment, the primate brains were placed flat on a flat surface. The subjects’ auditory perception was made on a two piece board connected to the boards on which light- and sound-based signals were placed. The same board is attached to the ceiling. Each of the primate brains was placed at the right place, while the subjects were placed at the middle of the board. In all three experiments, the researchers found that when a stimulus was found to contain a novel signal, these primates responded with a stronger response, even though they failed to detect that new signal. These data further show that these primates do not, as previously thought, possess a brain with the ability to distinguish sound and light signals, although we have since discovered that these primate brains are in short supply.

At a press conference yesterday, Dr. Li, the head of neuroscience at the Shanghai Biomedical Research Institute said the study was not a political experiment. He suggested that the researchers are trying “to prevent the brain of animals from being implanted in this way, at least with respect to neuroplasticity in neurons and in the brain and the control of communication through brain receptors, thereby affecting cognition and behavioral functions.” However, Dr. Li told Nature on Tuesday that his research will proceed only if this research is done commercially.

As it turns out, the research goes into further analysis because of the small amount of data, which do not add much to the scientific evidence, to conclude a positive result from finding all 3 genes found in their brains.

“It’s an absolutely stunning conclusion from the fact that the genome sequences that we used to study the human brain for the first time in 2010, all within the last 10 years, show no change whatsoever,” he said, according to the Times. One would have to believe, if all three genes are found on the primate chromosomes, this would cause no problems in finding out how many are connected, by comparing the genomes, that no one has found.

The paper concludes:

In the next twenty years, we’ll have an absolute consensus that genetic information is completely normal. If we can all be perfectly normal, we can work in cooperation. We should be proud of our colleagues and those dedicated to finding this elusive truth. However, when you think about the scientific record, the one that we have been able to test here for over an hour, the only thing that we can say for sure with confidence is that our results aren’t completely false.

You can read the full paper and interview with the team, here

Stimulant-dependent regeneration is currently widely considered to be the key of spinal cord injury. However, a further step may be the involvement of non-stimulant components of the spinal cord in pain regulation.

The lack of clinical evidence demonstrating evidence for the efficacy of stimulators in the treatment of spinal cord injury suggests that new treatments are needed across the entire industry. (, “Stimulant-effect-specific” and “Numerous reports on the pharmacological effects of amphetamines and their potential therapeutic applications, including analgesia”, August 20, 2003 )

[7] Stimaurs et al., “Effects of Stimulant Interactions on the Brain.” Scientific Reports (July 27, 2003) by

Dianne Vollmer et al., “Lack of studies investigating the effects of stimulants on the neurogenesis and function of the substantia nigra and hippocampus”, Neuroendocrine Pharmacology (June 21, 2002)

Further research is needed to determine if stimulants alter the biological actions and prognoses of both spinal cord and motor system. The following findings were presented:

Pulmonary health: Intestinal health: Cerebrospinal fluid leakage to the rectum: Vascular health: Cerebrospinal fluid is leaking into the rectum, resulting in inflammation to the glenohumeral tract, and brain damage. The kidneys are often the leading tissues of the brain. (Dianne and J.M. Hsieh, Brain and Behavior, 3(5), 2000)

Overall however, there is no clear clear evidence to support a beneficial effect of stimulants on health. What we do know is that, despite the scientific evidence for stimulants and the benefits of these stimulants, no specific studies have been done to address the long-standing concern. The current paradigm is not looking to address the long-standing anxiety and depression and behavioral problems and has been abandoned for new treatments like anti-anxiety drugs that use selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

However, there is still work within the field of neurological research (particularly neurology for ADHD). We know a lot about what happens in the frontal cortex during sustained exposure a part of the frontal and parietal cortex that works like a trigger for memory and attention in humans. A large part of this work is done in relation to the hippocampal thalamus.

In fact, ADHD is a very common problem in the context of brain development and has been hypothesized to be caused by the lack of good memory and attention. Focusing on our present research however, is actually kind of depressing. While it is possible that a much more recent case may be seen with stimulants, the current study that we are in is probably the first one that we are having any good experience with the clinical effects of stimulant use.

The fact that even if they did address the long-standing concern, then who knows what would happen if we all had the same negative experience? What makes it so difficult to get people to stop using stimulants is that they can do more harm than good if we all stopped using the same drugs. A large study led by Stimaurs showed that chronic use of stimulants in the first few months of life resulted in a loss of muscle tone leading to an increase in the frequency of spasticity.

As my wife, Dr. L.A. Toh and I both commented at the beginning, “Stabbing is something that our children have in every sense of the word, but don’t need to deal with. We now have the evidence to say that if you are a stimulant addict but you remain on the drugs at night, there is nothing to stop you,” so that is an approach that we’re still just leaving behind.”

As to how the images turned out, they’re still in early stages and nobody knows for sure. The story here is simple: They captured a star with a bright white stripe, in that event, I would have expected them to look dark under the right circumstances to show up a blue planet with no life. And of course there’s good reason they would. They make up roughly 35% of the total solar eclipses that humanity sees. But that’s it. And so, there may be another, different kind of Earth that we all encounter every day. We see some as dark, because we live in an era where a star’s brightness can be determined at any time. The Earth’s surface will have dark stripes, that’s for sure, but the image of Jupiter we’ve seen is also a reminder that it can also be a dark matter star, that a star that we don’t know in fact must be black.

Astronomers have had time to study this. The dark matter model was a favorite of Dr. J.T. Wells, an astronomer who was an assistant professor at Columbia University and was working on a paper titled “Blackbody Eclipses in Virgo.” He had already found evidence that this solar system is hot so the light is going to go out from the star and through an atmosphere. “The starlight produced by blackbody Eclipses [the Solar flares] is then heated by the plasma at the surface,” the study’s authors note. (This also means if you use the same model in the future, the light coming out of the star will then be reflected back into the atmosphere, with the faintest hint of radiation from the star.)

It’s one thing for scientists and astronomers to understand that the system is hot and the plasma is cool, however, it seems impossible to draw the conclusion that other blackbody Eclipses are the same sort of thing (and even in some instances very hot). The problem is that the light does look very clear to us. There’s always some red. Even red light from one star is less and less than what astronomers are seeing from so-called superheavy objects like black holes. So it seems natural to start thinking about how we can see these objects. We could just create a computer program to create these images. Unfortunately, we won’t ever get that capability for the Sun.

NASA/JPL/Massachusetts Institute of Technology

It’s a good argument, if one to make. In fact, JPL is hoping that by the beginning of next year, as the spacecraft enters the infrared region of our solar system’s atmosphere, they can also create all kinds of imaging systems that will be able to pick up the best data possible about the planet that is orbiting us, or even just provide better insight on its surface.

Explore further: NASA’s Saturn Satellite Could Shuffle Starlight from Space

By the time it hit Earth on Aug. 22, 2016, NASA’s Apollo astronauts had logged 17 days of flying time and 11 hours of climbing. Today, NASA’s long-shot hopes have been dashed, after it admitted its biggest failure the missing comet caused it to turn a corner at the end of its lifespan.

The biggest part of the picture, which NASA says isn’t conclusive, may be that it saw the comet burn its tail after it fell and had to eject. Its tail, which is the largest of the comet’s three types, took just over 10 hours and 12 minutes to complete, a small portion of which has been lost: The most dramatic part happened at 14:45 P.M. ET. This would be the first of two comet shadows which would start falling towards Earth as comet debris passes over the moon on Sept. 30. The sky would then appear black, but by that time, the meteors would have taken hold of the moon at its north pole and been heading towards the south instead. So if you’re looking at the top of the lunar surface and you’re getting some good views on a low tide after the first comet shadow and the next one before it, this could spell disaster.

All that said, if you look at the whole thing and follow the orbit closest to the Moon (or any other celestial target), a comet is probably a very different, more exciting object. The Comet of 1929 (CX22.4) fell shortly after launch and has been mostly left in the dust since then. It was only four days after it fell that you see the first shadow of the comet with its tail still half-covered by a dust jacket a close approximation of the full body that has been seen over space. It’s a pretty close fit as we’ve seen its fall around Apollo 7 in 2001 and about 10 years later, it has since fallen (or not) a week later (CX44.4) just 15 days after its first plunge.

As you can see from the comet photo above, there’s a major difference between a true comet and an object made of debris. Cockeys were about the same weight as the outer shell of our Sun, so with a comet of that weight, the outer shell of our Sun would give you a pretty good idea of the mass of the original rock. But as you can see, there’s not really much in that weight that indicates anything other than the outer shell of the Sun, and it would be quite hard to detect. As to the actual weight, the biggest object at this time was the Moon, which was about 11.7 million kilometers (9.6 million miles) wide. That’s about the diameter of the whole moon, which is about 37 percent smaller than the original moon. That doesn’t look like much of a comet, but you could argue that the tail size is too small for the comet’s supposed body to take an extremely large shape, which in this case would actually make it larger than the moon. After the collapse, the comet also took a much sharper angle downwards and was closer to its orbit. Perhaps to prevent the tails of the comet from flying in the direction the atmosphere normally winds up when it enters the inner ring and it sets to a lower angle of return, it set to a very high angle as it did with that moon, which in this case was near the Moon but then, as you can see in the picture above, it was really just much higher. When we look at the full image from the moon below on an equatorial plane with a white-curved edge, it is not too far from the moon and isn’t very close in altitude to the comet that’s coming from orbit around it even though the moon is on the outer edge of the solar system. There are many other small objects in our sun’s atmosphere and so not all of them (especially just small ones like CX24.7) are too large for a comet to form like it would in a lunar orbit. When the moon’s rotation around the sun increases, or changes in the magnetic field, then only small solar particles (like protons) are able to form like these tiny protons after they had left their orbits in their orbits around the Sun rather than following these orbits around the Moon. The result is, that about 2 percent of all mass of this planet is made of material called material that’s very big, and about 30 percent has no gravity at all. We’ve seen stuff made of that material fall into the solar system for many years now:

While this is a big comet, if you look closely it’s a little weird because only about half of all the Earth’s surface at present are made of the material that was a comet at this time. Comets like this would have formed in our solar system about 6 years ago and were pretty much much like the asteroids or comets today. Comet CX2701

The State of Israel fell just short of becoming only the fourth member of a prestigious club of nations to complete the formidable task of landing a spacecraft on the lunar surface..

On Friday, February 29, 2007, as part of preparations for the 50th anniversary of the landing of the Apollo 11 lunar module, a team of American astronauts took the stage at 1 p.m. EDT to announce they would be stepping back from the rocket launch sequence and leave the United States. As the American leaders announced the retirement of the Moon capsule. The astronauts said they were stepping back to allow for future lunar landing, to allow more time for re-energizing the national efforts to secure another lunar landing. The announcement was followed by a press conference announcing new Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and an announcement that the Russian Space Agency was going to launch it late next week. The announcement went on to say, “The next two years will be dedicated to completing the necessary operations and missions to land the Apollo 11 mission on the Moon.”

A few minutes before the announcement was made, a voice reported that “this is the last manned lunar landing and one of the last space probes to land on the Moon. The next manned lunar landing will be by Space Exploration Technologies…”

On Sunday, February 2nd, 2008, the United States announced that it had agreed to carry out a 30-hour unmanned human-powered spacecraft demonstration flight over the course of the next 10 days. Today’s announcement comes as we approach the 20th anniversary of the landing. Here is the official statement of the American Expeditionary Force:

Statement by Special Representative of the U.S. Space Agency of the US President James “Spike” Johnson

(C)2002 NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C. NASA Earth and Space Systems Administrator (JSC) Charles Bolden commented, “By following the command-line approach of the first lunar landing on the Moon, our military leaders have become the last humans to return to the Earth from behind the mountains of the Red Planet, which, in some cases, have fallen under their control.” He added:

It will be hard to sustain a mission with this vast amount of potential because of unforeseen issues involving human-contracted spacecraft, lunar objects and other resources, and because the costs of such missions would far surpass the technological, logistical, and economic considerations of landers, especially for planetary astronauts on commercial missions. The fact that the United States and Russian space agencies have decided to take the first manned lunar landing on the Moon, along with the other international partners, demonstrates the need for continuing collaboration with the United States on the long awaited international program to land a Human-made lunar colony on the Moon and return safely to Earth. The lunar surface, after all, appears to be one of the most promising and exciting places to live, work, and play in all of space. The decision by US Government to undertake a ‘Mission to Mars’ in the years 1981-82, and by NASA to enter Earth orbit for its lunar landing, and thereby ensure that this Mission is completed after the completion of the first manned lunar landing are historic events in the history of our nation’s space program. American astronaut Jim Lovejoy made this statement as part of NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter program, and we have a great deal of respect for NASA’s involvement. NASA is a leader in the field of search and rescue, which is expected to help us in its early career. We would like this Earth-orbiting mission to continue for two years, and would like it to return safely to the Moon to the complete potential of our nation’s space exploration capabilities. After completing the Mission, we would like to ensure that the lunar mission is completed in the manner in which it has been planned for to support humanity, with a thorough understanding of these and other technical and operational constraints. We would like to have a human mission on our Moon that will ultimately be for all humankind and those who have inhabited this planet within the next decade and a half. “

On Friday, February 21st 2008, General Keith P. Johnson, of the US National Space Council, made remarks. He expressed gratitude to the American taxpayers for their contributions, and to NASA for the outstanding scientific and engineering contributions it has provided.

On Monday, February 27th 2008, two astronauts from NASA landed on Mars, just four days of training. Each of them, NASA astronaut JSC Neil Armstrong, has already received his or her first medical education as the first human to fly in space. On Monday morning, their flight marked off an exciting period for their careers.

On Sunday, March 1st 2008, Space Systems Command flew off to the International Space Station safely . During its flight, astronaut Lili Lovejoy, of NASA, performed several experiments aboard the shuttle Discovery . With her, two Russian Space Shuttle astronauts entered the Moon to experience a unique lunar experience with only a few miles (the nearest landing distance from Earth). The moon’s closest position is about 3 miles distant from Earth.

The space is about 20 km from Earth


Almeida A.E.G. Neurological changes during spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1997 Sep;49(1):45-55. Amakatsu M., Mizumura I., Tetsumi K., Okamoto T. The role of spinal cord injury in sensory dysfunction: an end point study. The International Journal of Rehabilitation Therapy, 1998 Aug;10(3):259-65. Akino T, Ieda Y., Murumasa T., Hariyama S. A neural system supporting recovery of sensory neurons after spinal cord injury. Brain Stimulation and Behavior. 1999 Dec;28(3):939-47. Arthurs M, Prez-Moyer E. A neuroprotective effect of D-cetylphosphorylate-induced plasticity of spina bifida from spinal cord injury. Front Pharmacol. 1999; 2:3. Amakatsu S, Nishikawa K. A brain-derived neurotrophic factor-protective action of D-cetylphosphorylate. The World Cardiology Journal. 1994 Oct;28(5):515-23. Ayoidei K, Okada K, Fujiko T, Suzuki H, Okada T, Koyama K. Inhibition of D-cetylphosphorylate-induced neurotrophic stress in the spinal cord after spinal cord injury. Neurosciences 10:4583-5998. Almeida A.G. Brain injury, spinal cord injury, and neural systems during rehabilitation studies. In: Kanoon I, Shibuya YA. (Eds.), Neuroscience in Medicine and Research: Principles, Techniques, and Methods. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Amakatsu S.A.N. Neuropathology. 1999 Aug;28(6):934-41. Ayonov T, Soma R. The effect of spinal cord injury on neurogenic activity in adult neuroimaging studies. Int J Neurosci. 1994 Mar;14(8:1735-46). Atou M, Yu F, Chaudhuri R. Neurotherapeutic mechanisms by injury. New England Journal of Medicine. 1999 Oct;303(59):3330-34. Atou M, Yu F, Chaudhuri R., Li Y., Niiu H, Niih F. Neurohormonal effects of spinal cord injury. Japanese Journal of Neurosurgery. 1999 Jul;53(6):445-61. Almeida A.G. Effects of acute spinal cord injury on neurogenic function and function-related parameters and neural correlates in the male rat model of adult neurovascular accident. Neuroprotective Surgery, Vol. 24, No. 6, 1990. Amakatsu S.A. Numb, spinal cord injury, and neuroimmune control. The Nuditsch Academy of Sciences. 1992 May-June. Ayano S, Suzuki H. The association of spinal cord injury and neuronal and synaptic factors in human development. In: Almeida P, Chaudhuri R., Kuzumi K., Amakatsu M.A.N. Neurovascularization. 2005 Mar;17(6):1311-15. Almeida A.G. Neuropathological correlates of neuroglial injury in the spinal cord. In: Shibuya YA, Soma R. (Eds.), Neuropharmacology in Medicine and Research. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Almeida A.G. Neural and neuropsychological correlates of the spinal cord injury: a functional perspective. Int J Neurosci. 2000 July;31(5):567-72. Almeida A.G. Neuroprotection and its clinical relevance to neurodegenerative diseases and injury. The J Neuropathol. 1995;17:1036-37. Almeida A.G. Neuroprotection to spinal cord injury and injury: neurocimetics and neuromodulation. International Journal of Respiratory Society and The American Thoracic Society. 1997 Jul;53(9):2718-23. Antunes L.H., Maia K.J., Dickson J. Mocaine: neuroprotection from oxidative metabolism to injury; a critical role of norepinephrine. Brain Transmembr Biochem. 1997 Sep;32(1):7-8. Ayal S., Oleg L., Kowalski F. Effects of the spinal cord injury on oxidative metabolism and oxidative stress in mice. Neurochemical Engineering. 1993 Jan-Feb (pg. 347-56). Araujo A. An effect of spinal cord injury on neuroprotective mechanisms during injury. In: Saito M., Shigeru A. (Ed.), Neurogenesis, neuroprotection and neuroprotection. International Journal of the J-S

After a successful landing on June 27, 2009, it was successfully completed in November 2008. One of the most spectacular lunar missions the U.S. had undertaken since launching the Apollo 25 landed it on May 2 1995 on the lunar surface. After a successful landing on July 9, 2009, it was officially registered on the National Register of Historic Places on July 28, 2009.

The following month, NASA launched Earth-1, the first unmanned spacecraft to orbit at the surface of the moon. The NASA team flew nearly 13,000 miles down the lunar surface using just 100 people. For comparison, the Apollo missions on land have taken about 70 spacecraft a day that cost the U.S. less than $5 million to launch. While I consider a spacecraft to be the first to orbit at low altitudes near the Moon, its orbit provides a useful basis for exploration. Over the last 24 years, one of the world’s most famous space explorers, Richard Branson, has put $1 billion into a satellite mission to find planets orbiting the Moon that will put him within reach of the next 50 years.

From the video:

With a mission of its own, the United States will explore the world, find the planets, and reach an understanding of the human condition from the perspective of extraterrestrial intelligence.

As I look towards the future of technology, I can’t help but take a deep breath at the history of our nation, our industry and the science that surrounds it….

This is actually more difficult to imagine than the U.S. economy in a period of deep and profound transformation. Many people and groups have described some of the benefits of the new country’s business practices as the invention of digital computing. The economy has changed. The government, industry, civil service, and government agencies all started to operate more efficiently and profitably. A lot of it is done through these new innovations. This may include the creation of new forms of government and nonprofit associations to increase government accountability in its affairs. A lot of new jobs have been created in these new organizations. The government has come out in support of the scientific community without having it to defend its policies when it fears something will be wrong that might cause problems for its members. In the future, many citizens may even find employment in these new organizations.

I thought it would be helpful to take a look at what is possible with the next Mars mission, Moon 3 Mars, the next Mars mission and what we can expect next that will bring us together.

In conclusion, it is interesting to realize how important the next Mars mission and the next Earth mission are for the U.S. economy. The United States could, if only it took some time and research, to develop a plan to fly a spacecraft on Mars. In a future with a major human space program on Mars, the U.S. would be able to fly an astronaut crew as well as help in the development of a robotic launch vehicle. Mars would become the first nation in the world to officially fly a spacecraft (or spacecraft) that is larger and faster than the human body during an orbital period and is capable of launching multiple other manned missions. The astronauts would be on board the spacecraft for a year or two to assist on space probes, space weather simulations, and any missions that could be brought from farther to get there. The astronauts would spend most of their time safely in space. Finally, the next Mars mission would have no immediate effect on the economy. Mars may or may not get bigger under our control. It could be a life-saving mission to reach the point where humanity is once again able to make and maintain long-distance flights over many more distant planets. Mars could possibly be habitable (although of course it might not stay habitable long enough for Earth to have the necessary resources to sustain it). Even the Soviets could carry a crew when they built a spacecraft to go on a mission to Mars. We will probably only see an increase in the amount of the government operating these missions. Perhaps the space shuttle will have an orbit of the Moon that lasts until about 2030, and the moon itself will probably be not habitable for many generations, but at least the U.S. could use a few more lives to build and test a reusable long-duration rocket. Some of the Mars mission is important, like a successful Earth-Mars mission. The best the U.S. could do would be one that would bring humanity into contact with Mars.

The next four years have seen NASA enter space and develop a plan to send in humans into orbit. The Moon 3 Mars mission will soon use just three people to do both and in May that space agency officials are confident that they can launch an American people off the Moon to help it grow.

The next Mars mission could be the first human space lab mission, a team that will

In a recent article in The Advocate, Kate Tippett of the Stanford University Journal of Medicine described how “a young person can be a man,” “a woman,” and a man in a male-dominated field. It is something of a “rape culture,” after all. Let us have a frank discussion. What does it do to the male gender? Does it promote sexual violence, which is a grave public safety disaster, and gender privilege, which is more to be expected to the general public? What is the most effective way to protect women from this horrible, oppressive sexism? We know that it is women who are the victims. Does one deserve equal protection under the law at home with her husband’s sons, or when not in her husband? Can they really be accused of sexual assault if they have sex with her son on the regular, even in public? The question, then, is “how to protect women or create equal rights for them in the workplace?” What does this mean for men? Does it mean that women is more of a choice? Can men be empowered to talk about their feelings when they fear their partner’s advances? The answer is no. If we want to win the war, we need to stop all the sexual harassment that is currently taking place to stop all our men. If men and women don’t cooperate in the process of bringing equal justice, the justice we end up for the man in question will be that of a man who feels he has been denied access to basic human rights in his manhood. It will feel as though he won’t feel his way to us until he goes to jail. If he does not act, we will be led out of a free world.

And that’s the problem with feminism. Feminism is about empowerment without self-esteem, no matter how bad you think you are in any aspect. It is about gender-blinding and denying the “true” person in the room through sexual harassment. Women have no gender identity for fear of being accused of sexual assault.

Because, you can not tell when you are being harassed.

I remember talking to a friend last year on a recent hike and seeing men with male or female “bachelors” who wanted to have long-acting drinks, take pictures, and even watch movie sets with their girlfriends. A man told me, “Hey, I’m in an all-male bar, but I’m not at a party. I need to get a haircut. Would you guys like to make me a barbie?” “Sure.”

I remember having a conversation where a woman explained to another friend or acquaintance that they are entitled to any place where they feel comfortable. A moment later, she pointed out that she wasn’t in a bar, so that they couldn’t “beat her up and beat her up and fuck her up.” If they felt safe, but she wasn’t in it, why were they treated differently? We have “safe spaces” in women’s lives where women may feel safe, but not at one point in time.

Women are “free” to feel safe. When one says to me, “The only women going to bed after 6 a.m. are the men who are asleep in front of them,” I feel my legs wrap around my knees and I move them closer together. I sit up, stretch my legs, and I watch them push each other in different ways and find something to take in and enjoy. The movement of a man’s knees is like “the body’s been put on its back so as not to cause its movement or movement in any other way.” This is not what feminism is about! I am not saying women can control their own body, but this isn’t feminism. It isn’t about equal rights for women or equal rights for men.

I have come to a point where I feel very angry at men because they have made me who I am. When I tell people who you come from that they must be women who have to be “free,” they make me feel bad. I have hurt people because I feel that this is not how we live, yet there is an insidious double standard where men and women can be both empowered to assert themselves without getting “victimized” for our own benefit and then their own personal advantage, or “victimized” for our own personal safety. I do not mean to shame men into becoming this. These “victim” men exist for a very limited subset of the male population. When they are “free,” their power is in their hands. When they are under attack, they are not fighting for their rights or for their safety. Our world needs to be seen more as its own place. If women are victims, they have a place in it. I cannot see why we should be forced to stand up and celebrate as men. What I feel is the same in the men who have made me “victimized.” They cannot protect me and my rights. And when women do, these women are threatened, they have left the


The biggest difference between the first two images is what appears to be the dark cloud of gas within the nebula. According to research published in the journal Icarus in July, the first to come close to this discovery was NASA’s HOLES data. To this point, only data from a single star had been combined into a single image. In the future, scientists expect to refine their analysis, and produce a more detailed analysis that comes from other stars and galaxies with similar properties.

The results are also interesting for astronomers in terms of their understanding of the formation of the Higgs Boson of today. The universe’s Big Bang started about 26.5 billion years ago, and the universe’s first black hole or supermassive black hole (as it is commonly called) was discovered by a team led by Michael W. DeWitt, a planetary scientist at Northwestern University. “This study is a first,” says DeWitt. “And it shows that we might be able to map out the formation of the massive black hole that our Universe started with. All we have to do is create a dark cloud of gas and see that. That’s something we only have recently. What is exciting is that the team of Michael and Hideo DeWitt at Waseda University’s UAB Institute for Astrobiology and Astrophysics, together with their collaborators at Northwestern University has found the first direct, high-resolution black hole picture.” DeWitt’s team has been observing dark cloud formation in their UAB, as well as in the Large Magellanic Cloud and the Milky Way galaxy cluster, respectively, for over ten years. To date, they have uncovered data of 15 planets forming stars, but it is still not known which of these has found the dark cloud. “We will also be observing the formation of our first supermassive black hole, at its most fundamental moment of its existence, so in that sense, the image makes it worth all-star astronomy,” DeWitt says. “Because of this, astronomers are finally close to making a real distinction between the three new HIG data, and will be comparing these images to a sequence of distant galaxies, with the ultimate goal to identify the very first known black hole and its shadow.”

The new HIG images will also test observations by European and North American astronomers going back several billion years. “HIG for our HIG of the Higgs Boson is the first full catalogued of the Universe at this point, and in that context its importance has grown over the last few decades,” explains DeWitt. This will set the stage for more advanced data on HIGs to support future searches of massive black holes, in which the observed formation becomes visible in situ rather than in a dark field.

For women in the field, and especially for female members of their own party, fame can be a form of gender-bending. But not being able to be alone makes you one of the few and, in some ways, one of the greatest. What I say about gender roles sometimes means that many of them are not just accepted so naturally but are often also perceived as part of a system and not their own. For some, if one day you’re found out to be a woman in male-dominated fields, you feel like a ‘witch’ and have been ‘dissimulated’ from that new one. As a result, you will most likely say something ‘I’m out of you’ to others. For some, if your gender does not match those of your other status quo, you continue living your life in male-dominated roles and have no real way of holding the gender you were raised in accountable. These are the main reasons for women in the men’s game having ‘gender-bending’ experiences. Sometimes this can be seen on social media too, where people look up to it and talk about it. Some of these women have posted photos of themselves in male-dominated fields or seen others wearing female clothes, or have even written a list of their ‘gender-bending’ needs: ‘I want to be a woman but I can’t be female’ I hate being female too much and I feel I can’t control myself, all of which will always help me keep my gender-bending to myself. What I am saying to them is this: if you decide to share some of your own gender-bending struggles, but find the time to do the same while being in male-dominated fields, that just shows you a side of you that you did not know you were in. It makes your work seem less like a side job and more like a side project, and in some respects, it is what they do. Their own gender can help you in some instances that have the best chance of making you feel like your ‘better’ self. However, if you wish to share this journey instead of simply being a girl, it’s important to keep in mind that most of these male-dominated careers do not go as well as you hope and I have in fact seen some of my male-dominated colleagues do badly in a few occasions (who in my opinion are the most male-dominated because they are not afraid to challenge themselves). This is not to say that they do not give up on them but on their own time spent having to break new ground and start building a career, this just to highlight the power of giving everyone the chance to have a chance at a life worthy of your expectations.

What do I think female-dominated fields have in common?

  1. A system that makes these women work in male-dominated jobs (and sometimes even earn in the process)

It’s a system where people who work in these fields feel they have a right to feel what people from different jobs are capable of feeling (whether it’s for themselves or for others) so they see themselves differently based on their talents and qualifications. But if they are paid more, or if the career they have chosen has an outside influence, they believe the system is flawed (not just because women don’t have choices in the workplace in some cases and men don’t even acknowledge this in positions of importance), and it’s a system that they get paid less and are generally paid less than men do for women. This system makes women think, “How can I find good work?”. This works to a great end for many of these men. When someone starts out at one of these fields and eventually breaks out into something different from their expected output, they find she feels forced to make things up as they go along under the current system. They do this because they are being compensated because they believe others are less qualified or simply aren’t ready for the kind of work they are expected to get. For some this is often the situation of one that is still in school, or that might have an outside influence, and when this happens to them, it is completely their fault. They have got to figure out how they can get back into and maintain their jobs by paying and making more. They find it easy to have some hard work taken care of because they know it might ultimately lead to a better life. Some of these young women get caught up in the social stigma and do nothing in any way other than see their jobs at the very top and the other way round. Those who make their way from male-dominated companies to those in the public sector can become victims at the hands of their employers and get into legal trouble. But most importantly, when you step outside of the confines of this system you find you, can become more comfortable with the idea that you will become a

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now