entertainment

Wait how many more seasons will Warner Bros have? And how will the script be adapted? For Blumhouse, the film will debut as a limited, 90-minute film (with full music by Linklater) this summer…. Meanwhile, in the book world, Stephen King has posted a piece he wrote a couple of years ago about his experience playing Merrily in a Hollywood production. Here’s an excerpt

It is one of the most beloved characters in American pop culture, a lovable little redneck in a land of rednecks, and it’s a lot of fun to play. With The Mist, Mr. King plays to the strengths of his character. In the previous movie (American Psycho and no, he didn’t write that book), Patrick Bateman grew so sick of the hero worship and hokey Hollywood melodrama that he turned into a murderous monster. That was a change from the character Mr. King started in Merrily for the first time: he’d gotten very sick of all the hokey Broadway crap. The original screenplay for The Thin Red Line was about a poor immigrant. His only friends were an Irish prostitute and a black cab driver. His wife fell in love with a rich guy from the South. The real character was a man from America with an Irish son who grew into a man of great dignity but who never got his shit together enough to move out of a motel. He wanted to set up a chain of restaurants all across this country. Not quite the plot of a B-movie in the way Merrily is set up, the original script really wasn’t too bad. But the film itself wasn’t as good. In fact, the movie was pretty terrible. Not so much for the tone (it was about an abused son who gets a new job at the motel manager’s office it was the kind of movie you wrote and shot in an afternoonbut for the actingI’m not very good at it) but for the direction. (The cast and crew were really good, although the director, Joel Surnow, didn’t get much credit for making the movie.)

So why did the film have to be made? Why wasn’t the script rewritten and the character changed? If The Thin Red Line is the kind of movie where it takes a while for the hero to catch up with his shit because he’s a loser without enough dignity, where did Merrily and the other Merrily books come from?

The answer, of course, is the film industry at large. For decades, the notion of making a movie like The Thin Red Line was a pipe dream. And now it’s been turned into a realitywith an Oscar for Best Pictureand the success is just another piece of evidence demonstrating the extent to which the production and distribution of movies has changed since the days of the “takes everything except the soul” of American film, when a film that couldn’t find a distributor and earned a pittance made it onto every screen by simply existing. Like an American dream, the movie industry is now a house of cards. This one house of cards is the creation of two companies: Warner Bros. Pictures (which bought the title rights from Warner Bros. for $400 million) and Disney Pictures (which bought Merrily and the other Merrily books from Blumhouse for $7.25 million). These two corporations were the first companies in the world to start marketing movies after the movie rights to the properties were obtained as part of a publishing deal. While the deal with Warner Bros., Disney and Blumhouse will keep these guys in business for one more few decades, there’s more to this story.

The film industry and their marketing and distribution methods are being dramatically altered while the artists and authors of the past get left behind. But there will be no one left behind. In fact, there will be many more.

If you haven’t heard of A.J. Liebling, that is no mystery at all. In 1961 he published his first novel, A Good Man Is Hard to Find, which was a big seller and has been in print continuously ever since. And on December 25, 2009, the last edition of his work will be publishedthe last book to be published under the name of A.J. Liebling. A book is an ancient form of writing. The past thirty years have seen a major transformation of the art of writing. Most are best read in order, if you want to take your time. For some, reading is as simple as turning on your computer and going to your search engine and typing in the title of the book you’re interested in. The internet is the new writing center because it makes it easy to access all sorts of literary resources at once. But the new writing center doesn’t even represent the greatest advantage for new writers. Instead, it represents, for the most part, the greatest disadvantage. For there are a few writers who would never choose to write on the internet nowthe writers, like Mr. Lie

The episode, which aired after a White House press gaggle with his fellow Republicans, was a bit of a disaster in the fall and a great political PR success for his campaign in the spring.

The problem, though, is that he is not exactly the brightest bulb in the room. He has recently made comments about President Obama’s birth certificate and claimed that the current health care plan is ‘a big mess.’ I wouldn’t expect him to be particularly interested in the contents of a bill, which he has argued for less than a year. (And, to be fair - when it comes to Obamacare, he, as president, has done much to hurt it.)

Also, for some reason, his campaign seems very keen to exploit the anti-Asian attitudes of Asian America. Last month, the campaign made an ad which showed a smiling Japanese woman trying to get into a Japanese bathroom…with signs along both sides like, ‘I am not Japanese - I am a Muslim (or, more usually, a Sikh).”

As well they might.

Now, I think Mr. Gillis is actually very insightful and politically savvy, although, for some reason, I sometimes find his commentaries on immigration more of a personal attack on the Democratic candidates and politicians on the other side of the political divide.

He’s obviously well versed in immigration and a critic of the immigration policy that I think has brought us to this point. But he often seems to feel that the only way he can help with immigration reform is to attack Asian Americans specifically.

The problem is that what he does, which I’m hoping most readers already know, isn’t the most effective form of the message that he wants to send.

A lot of what he does, as it turns out, strikes me as a lot of sound and fury but really little substance. For one, he often doesn’t consider how people are responding to his comments and how he could use his own personal views in a more effective way.

For another, he often seems far more interested in making himself appear as “good” on immigration reform at the expense of being taken seriously. He thinks he can make a deal withthe anti-immigration groups (which is not likely a deal at all to a Democratic president) andgive them stuff that he wants to stick in the bill that he is trying toprovethere really is a problem with, although it’s only made that clearer by the attacks.

All three of those problems are probably going to come back to bite him and in the end, he’s just going to get dragged down with the anti-immigration groups.

It’s a lot more effective just to talk about how, as he himself has admitted, it’s ‘time to stop talking about immigration.’

Reehil is the founder of the National Coalition Against Cults and other groups that work with victims of such groups.

“We think that it is extremely important that we not get carried away and believe that the good ones [good] will triumph over evil. It is an old theme that has been used by religious, mystical groups. But in reality good and evil isn’t there to be ruled, it is there to be conquered,” Reehil told me from his office. “We believe that the good ones must beat the evil ones through the power of prayer and persuasion. We urge everyone to think through the details of how some of these religious groups behave.” So what does this look like to me? This isn’t some new religious doctrine. It’s called psychological control through an old trick. It goes by many names, but it has basically the same kind of thing.

First, the victim hears the sermon or read a book or talk at a community meeting that tells them a different kind of message. Then the group meets in secret places where they discuss it. Then they try to manipulate the victim through talking about its benefits and its weaknesses. They try to keep the information secret so that the victim is not prepared when confronted with their lies, their manipulation of the emotions and thoughts of the group members. For example, one religious group told its volunteers that people who leave the group had a tendency to commit adultery. In turn, people who join the group would have a tendency to commit adultery.

And it never gets any better than this. The survivor receives the bad advice from other members, and they try to push the survivor to leave. The survivors in the group learn to believe it is true from the outside, from a different source, and from their own imagination. A group that does this is not interested in working with its members. If it doesn’t have a leader, it will be run by a weak, scared person who is easily influenced.

And then there’s the other side. The members of the group go to a public meeting where they tell their lies. The perpetrator gets another chance then. They try to sway the group with their influence. That’s where all the real manipulation is, and where the real attacks occur. This is not a new problem. It’s not about the occult. It is a problem rooted in our own history.

According to Reehil, one of the first instances of psychological torture in history emerged from the secret religious groups. They were originally an important part of some mystical, spiritual society. In the 1940s, there was a great spiritual debate between theologians and church members. This debate led to a breakdown in the religious community. Because there was no single clear definition of what was legitimate religion, it all just kind of drifted around. The question was about what would be the church. In our modern society, everything would be deemed illegitimate and must be rejected. But that is not what actually happened.

By the time the groups went public, religious ideas were still being discussed with one another. People were being led astray by the false teachings of this spiritual grouping. And people started feeling very alienated by the groups. Now the idea is that these groups were used as an escape or scapegoat by someone who was trying to keep control of the members - in fact, they were very useful to the abusers.

Over time, those groups turned into cults. This led to the creation of the government. Now those cults are now the primary organizations of the government. They are very powerful, and they are very successful in the control of the masses.

The issue we must avoid is the false dichotomy. How should we categorize those who practice good and those who practice evil? Is there an evil side to the world? In fact the only evil side that I hear about in my daily life is from bad-minded people who practice witchcraft and magic.

“The spiritual world and the humanistic world are really intertwined,” Reehil said. He is convinced that modern humanism is one of the greatest frauds ever to exist. But it doesn’t matter to the bad people that we are all together. What does matter is how we will move forward.

“When we have a truly open and honest society, we will have better outcomes for everyone and we will all come out the other side more free.”

A statement from the Royal Family says that she will be visiting the UK in the “near future”. Well, of course she will, as British royalty always do, but I suppose its not exactly news as the royal family always visit and are often photographed with their beloved babies at birth. I guess the idea is that she can meet the British royal family when she arrives and give them a “thank you”.

The royal baby with the Prince of Wales and his wife, Kate

Prince Harry with his wife MeghanThe Royal Mother with her husband and family

A young Princess Anne. Photo: AP, 2014. Prince Harry has said he wanted to spend time with his wife, who is 11, and their daughter, now 2, while they are working on their own royal projects. The prince, 34, said he would prefer to spend time with his wife as she is “tremendously proud of her parents”. He also said that she had been “very clear” that she wanted to have a bigger role in parenting. His mother’s parents, Princess Anne, 57, and Philip, 54, have made a family history of spending a lot of time with the royals. Their first great-aunt was also Princess Anne’s grandfather and Duke of Kent, Catherine, was their father’s maternal grandmother. The Duke and Duchess met their late grandparents, Princess Alice of Germany and Crown Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. It is said that Catherine, the Duchess of Kent, did say, “Prince Albert might have something I can teach him” in German when she first met him in 1926. Her maternal grandmother was Queen Victoria and even Prince Royce came in for a fond kiss with her grandparents after receiving a special visit from Queen Victoria.

Prince Harry’s Mother is Mother Theresa

It’s not too hard to imagine that the Queen herself and her daughter would like a royal visit! So, who will actually take part that will give the crown to the Prince of Wales, who will take a seat next to the queen on one side and the Prince of Wales on the other? The British press reports that, The Queen has asked, whether they will even meet Prince Harry’s mother, Queen Elizabeth Beatrice. The queen is apparently “very pleased” that all of her ancestors, from Duke of Kent, to Empress of India and Queen Victoria, are all here in the UK. But theycouldn’tquite get a response. Of course, they could also get to meet the newly christened royal baby and, since the Queen will not be here this time, why not have a brief reunion with her own mother, who is currently on holiday in France with Prince William. Perhaps not as a dignified individual, but as a humble one who is now free from the pressures of being pregnant, and so she can focus on the tasks of raising her children. We’ll just have to wait and see who she chooses.

ive seen what i say about “sucking up” as far as some members not wanting to see a guy who has been fighting, and is really a strong member, and a really nice guy, suffer and go away, because they feel like I am being more demanding…. That just makes my point that the members of the board don’t see me as being “nice”. I’ve had guys leave the forum, who had been on about 2 and 1/2 years, have had people leave in their 50’s and have been in the same situation as me….

I think that if you ask why, you’re asking the wrong question. I don’t think you’re asking, why, people are leaving. People, people all over the world are leaving the forum because of that… Because they get sick of hearing “nice guy” or “lady” and I believe this is a major cause of it. You are in a community where you don’t have the ability to deal with people other than that, to get better and to help other users. This forum is based solely on the idea of sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and this is what causes so many people to leave….

Maybe I’ll put this on my personal blog… In January 2017… the first big wave of the leave was coming… I had a member who had been on the community 3 years, and now had been on for only 2 months, and leaving. He had never been asked to pay anything, and for years, had managed to run an email server of sorts. Then, he went on to say, “I guess I’ll stop giving money now.” He said he could no longer stay because he “can’t handle” what was going on there. Just like me. Then, he left. We never had a big disagreement like this for a long time. And yet, the members of the board began telling me how “nice” he was… He told us how long he went on, how much he had given, how his friends were really very nice and nice… How he even helped us out… He said people in that community could handle that. I’d go to the person, I wouldn’t ask them to buy anything for me, or to give me money, or to give me advice…. This guy had been on here for over a year. I didn’t take it well. I said you guys are telling me I didn’t have the right to get advice with this kind of situation… I actually wanted to help him, to find a way for him to stay… Now he was gone. I told them I was going to “help” the community the best way I knew how, and for the only way I knew how… But then they gave me little things to give them to help with. I would have given more money, and things like this, if they’d actually asked me to do that, than if they just would’ve told me. I was getting so sick of hearing “nice guy” as a reason people were leaving…. That should be another reason why people leave as well.

I also was getting sick of the negativity… and the negativity was growing. After I had been talking with this person for a while, he actually went away for about a month, because he said he got sick of the negativity… I said to him, “Don’t worry about yourself, we are all happy here.” Not like the average member who’s always complaining about how the site doesn’t exist, or how the moderators here don’t have the right to say what they do (something I understand)… But saying that all these sites that you haven’t been to before, and think are nice, all you have to do is become active, and then you will get a happy community. He said no… After a while, he started coming back and then a week ago, he said he wouldn’t come back, and ended up leaving. The same same time I told him I was going to help out the community… and I did so. He is a great guy, and there is such a good community out there… I’m still getting tired of all the negativity.

I’ve said before, I thought the reason I felt so comfortable with the community (and I still feel so comfortable, or at least in my skin at the moment) was because the moderators were there for me…. I was always very patient and kind to them… Always gave them “good points” on my ideas. I thought if I’d treated them better, and respected them more, as I am doing now, I would be able to have a more relaxed relationship. It doesn’t matter how great the ideas are, if someone can’t live with the community being negative, I’ve found that I feel like it “undermines” the concept of the community…. If people can’t feel good about the community being where they are… then that’s just not a good idea.

If I said to you, “Hey man, how about some positive things? It

The victim, played by Rosario Dawson, is shot in the chest, her heart-shaped scar shows, and while the doctor’s handling her wounds is quick, he doesn’t call hospital until she’s already died. She was shot in the back in the ‘80s?

You were shooting her in the back in the ‘80s, why is Netflix’s version not an hour more real?

Dawson’s character was not injured in that case; she was actually abducted, assaulted, and raped by a gang of boys. She was not raped in the movie version, and when the movie is seen, her breasts are not even exposed in the original. She dies of heart-related issues because her heart was taken out of her chest. These two things don’t make the same movie, but they make drastically different movies.

One might also point to the fact that in the movie, Dawson’s character dies in the end. “No”, says Dawson, “I was raped and killed in the film. That’s how the story is, and that’s how I lived back then.”

I didn’t know that they went from the beginning to the end and made the sequel with the same story, or that the woman who was kidnapped and raped was a prostitute. But that’s the point: it didn’t matter why Rosario’s character died either in the original film or in the sequel. There was going to be the same story; the same person was going to die for the same reason, and the same person was going to be saved. The difference was about plot. That’s why.

A few other details about Dawson’s character and the incident have become evident in the current season of “13 Reasons Why”. Here’s a partial list for you!

  • Rosario was initially a prostitute. When it comes to the original version of the show, the movie, and the character of Hannah: that’s pretty much it.

  • “Dawson” has been the victim of some violence in the past, at least one physical assault (a bit more on that later). In the original version, her mother killed her for saying that her mother was the most beautiful woman she had ever seen. In the film, the mother (played by Shannon Purser) is stabbed when she confronts her about her behavior after her daughter is killed; it is unclear whether he did it out of revenge or fear. “Dawson” claims not to remember whether or not she was abused. In the original version, Dawson’s father calls her a whore because of how much she likes to have sex. The film takes this a bit further by showing how Dawson was raped both times, and the rape scene that leads up to it. The film does not show her actual rape, and it shows the rapist as her best male friend, even though they are not close friends in the original version. This was part of the argument for filming the rape scene in the first place. Shannon Purser is a pretty badass character. No one has done more of her face off. She has been shown brutalized and tortured just because it is interesting, by a person that is not “normal” in any way. This is something that the filmmakers could have just added in for a little more excitement.

  • In the original film, Hannah walks into the bathroom, and the person that attacked her is coming out of the other room… In the current one, Hannah comes out of the bathroom, and the person that attacked her is there. The scene is also shown, the assailant is the same person who raped Dawson’s dad. The only difference in the film is that the intruder doesn’t rape Hannah; he and Dawson are together when they get hurt. That’s it.

  • Rosario’s character was raped a few times, but a victim who survives the rapes is not really saved from her rape. In the original film, Dawson’s character lives and fights back for seven or more hours. She is actually pretty much done for after the second rape. In the current one (in season two), she dies after seven to nine hours of violence. And in the beginning of season three, we learn that the gang of boys who murdered Dawson are connected to another gang of boys who would later rape “the new person that Hannah chose to save”; we learn later that this gang is not even together at the time that she was kidnapped, but instead, they were at the funeral of the original murderer. Shannon Purser, when she was filming her scenes for the first two seasons, was wearing nothing but a bikini, and she was making out with the guy from the first gang of boys at the funeral.

(Lionsgate, 908 theaters)

Noah Baumbach has made many “blas” films over the years, but there’s one that has stood out above the rest: He may not have had as good a career in show business as some of his peers, and he’s only been able to make one “good” movie in his entire 35 year career. The story is about the end of an era, and the way that the world changed, but it never feels the least bit dated. It could easily be categorized as a romantic comedy, but the director seems to value his non-romantic sensibilities above all else.

The Revenant (2015) The director makes no bones about the fact that this is a survival tale. Most people who make an accurate portrayal of how things have changed will include some sort of moral dimension, but this is what The Revenant is all about: The stories of survival.

Heaven is for Real (2013) This post-apocalyptic action adventure movie is a great example of how a director can make a film that has an emotional core, while also having a “big enough” story to move the human race forward. The lead, Taylor Kitsch, has gone from a quiet film star to a hot commodity. He seems to be the man for the job, but there is also a sense that all is not what appears to be. The man who turns down The Big Lebowski is making a feature film.

The Master (2011) It’s really easy to get ahead in cinema for the audience, but most of us are constantly working to get ahead in life. If a director is as good at this as Stanley Kubrick or Martin Scorsese, we should be able to see the difference as quick as his film makes us feel it’s being played for laughs. When you get a chance, watch the entire trilogy, especially the documentary, “The Killing of a Sacred Deer” which chronicles the film and its aftermath. You’ll notice one scene in particular: a little boy is walking across a city square. He hears a man talking, and thinks his mother is talking to him–but she is not, and is actually trying to warn someone. As he runs across the square, he is hit by a flash drive, and is instantly dead.

The Neon Demon (1990) This horror anthology film had a solid reputation when it was released, but there are definitely some glaring issues with the film and the actors present. You may know the film from some of the trailers, but the film is no joke. It’s a very uneven film. A teenage boy was hit at a party by a metal object, and died as a result. Upon searching for the man guilty of murder and being informed that the body is not his, his family and then police believe each other, but a major piece of evidence against him is missing. The teen’s parents work as detectives and try to solve the issue, but they are constantly on the hunt for a suspect. The story follows the teen’s friends as he looks for an explanation for the murder, and the investigation into the case. For an 80+ minute film, the performance from the director is strong, and the story it presents is not.

The Purge (2016) — This is one of those films that I cannot recommend highly enough. The story follows a group of college students as well as a police officer who go undercover as a group of anti-war protestors as they attempt to spread their message using social media. Every movie has their own unique way of handling the film and story, but it’s always rewarding to see a film which really feels right in your hands. The action throughout is fast-paced and exciting, and the plot follows all the clichs that get made up today through the use of guns, vehicles, and government control.

The Prestige (2006) This thriller is set in a time where most of the greats have retired, and the world has reverted to its more primitive state. In the midst of the crisis, a character learns that the world doesn’t want him, and his life can only be saved through a last-minute intervention. There’s a great sense of loss, and a real sense of dread that many of the best films have in them. The cast is great. Dana Delany is great, and he brings it to life in his character, Edward Norton, as the protagonist of his time. There is a great sense of terror and fear. John Travolta’s acting is great, but the action is particularly impressive. The movie is certainly action-packed, but a great portion of the entertainment is also of the suspense. There are some good laughs in here, and I enjoyed the film greatly.

The Untouchables (1992) This is a really great example of a film that

It says in the report, which I highly recommend you read here:http://cjonline.com/2015/02/29/jerry-miller-to-pay-for-sex-crime-with-sex-offender-assistant(link was broken at time of post) That would add up to more than $2.5M! In the video the prosecutor said “there’s got to be a way” and then proceeded to make the accusation that Mr. Miller would put her into a sex-offender facility . He wasn’t going to take no for an answer. However, it turns out that the person who posted the request was in fact the woman who testified against Mr. Kelly in August. Now, in December my office was notified that the woman was going to be charged with filing false accusations and in the wake of the indictment, this was her story of what happened: I was trying to get her released from the jail where she was being held so she could get her life back. I was calling friends in the government who could help me. I told them I was a friend of the father of a woman who was working for the sheriff’s department in San Bernardino. When they heard about the sex case in his courtroom, they said they thought it was something they should help her with. So, I got out of jail. I got in my car and I drove to San Bernardino. I told my attorney about it. I thought she was going to be released for several months and then back. So, I made a small request.

A friend of mine named Debra Davis told me, this was in January - she was working in the county jail as a booking agent. She was trying to get her release, too.

The way they went for me was, I was supposed to drop off my daughter at her mother’s house on the way in. She’d asked me if I knew where that was. I didn’t. But, I knew where she was staying with her mother. So, as I pulled out of the court, she called me and said, “Lacey - your daughter will be back in the car near your car.”

And so the next day she picked my daughter up, and she called her grandmother.

She told her grandpa that she told my daughter she was going to drop her off at her mother’s house and she said, “This bitch has a sex-offender problem.”

His daughter said, “He gave me a card and said, ‘I’ll see you tomorrow.’ “

I got off the elevator. But this was all happening so quick.

I knew Debra, and we were sort of good friends. And here she was, accusing me of doing something wrong, even though she was a witness to it, and she said she’d come to the courthouse to testify for me. So she went in. And she got there and she just got so upset. She said she knew all along that she was not going home with my daughter, and she had put the whole thing together before she went and sat down. And she just went on and on and on and on and then the next day when he was accused of being guilty and getting her released - in the back of one of our cars when he was in the back seat.

The first thing Debra said was, “You’re not going to get out of jail today, either. You are going to be under house arrest with your children.” And that was it. That was the end of the case. And the other thing that happened at that time - and it was really very sudden for me to hear this - that was the day police arrested the other sex-offender from that trial that happened in July.

Again, just happened to the same house. And the next thing I knew is, there are several people waiting for the judge at court. And this is the point where the mother gets really upset because she had worked for her daughter’s school district for so long, and the people she worked with in the public schools were very angry at her for the whole case. She was very upset because what started as the case against her was the rape of this schoolmate that she knew, and here they were with a sex-offender, and he seemed innocent, and now he’s accused of this other kind of rape.

Of course, when a court takes a case like that, the victim’s advocate has to make those calls. And this is the first time they had heard from her. This was a case where she knew her perpetrator and everything that happened because she had told my office and made other calls with me. But then the first calls came and they were really upset with her, so they did not like the way the judge reacted in the case. And they became really upset with the judge. I had to tell the judge what had happened and I had to tell him, “They are the parents

The first is their appearance - The Ventimiggles generally wear glasses to see over their nose. Jack looks tired and has black hair on his head in a disheveled way. They’re also very good at making “unwanted” remarks to you they aren’t sure if they’re really going to be recorded or not.

The second difference is their politics. Milo Ventimiglia likes Bill Clinton and likes Ronald Reagan. Jack Pearson has no interest in either- he was involved in protesting Black Lives Matter in front of a synagogue. He likes Ted Cruz and likes the Republican Party. He likes Donald Trump. But he likes the Democrats. He voted for Obama! And he likes Bernie Sanders! Milo Ventimiglia loves both Trump and Bernie Sanders, he says “Both are really good for my political views.” Jack Pearson thinks the political parties have to be controlled more.

Jack Pearson was born in England and has come into this country with no formal education. He began as a waiter. He got married before starting on his culinary career. Now, he has two jobs at two restaurants and lives somewhere in between. On his Instagram he posted pictures of him on the job - he’s a bar manager and a busser. He is a former cook. His life has given him some amazing experiences. But it has also made him a very honest person. For example, he says the next time he gets into an argument he’ll cut from somewhere outside to another part of the restaurant and talk to someone else. Then maybe after that he’ll go back to the restaurant and begin trying new things. If you follow Jack, his story is inspiring.

When talking about how he’s lived his life, Jack Pearson said some of the most important lessons have been “You can either be a party animal and take the things that make you happy. Or you can work with what people in the media are saying and look for opportunities to make people more comfortable and comfortable about certain things.” And this is where we will be today. We’ll be talking about why Jack is an incredibly good friend and why most of us should call him friend. Our conversation will be about Milo Ventimiglia’s views on America, Jack’s views on America, and my opinion on America and America’s opinions. But first, a disclaimer to let you at least know who I am.I’m Milo Ventimigliaa writer by day and comedian by nightand I’m not exactly a politically correct kind of person. I’m not saying I’m not politically correct but at the same time I’ve never been political. I enjoy a freedom of creativity and self expression that I can never enjoy living in a party bubble. I just can’t abide the idea that everyone else should have that freedom. So, to all the people who think they are liberal or progressive but come to me a lot with questions- you need to ask yourself, can I believe this? Have I grown my opinions on life to the point where I can say, “Yes, I believe this and therefore it is part of my life.” I’m not talking about some kind of social justice thing. I’m talking about who I might be and what I think is important.

It’s been over a decade since I wrote my first comic book. It was before I’d worked for a major publisher- just a hobby, so it was the first time I got to test my writing ability and make real comics. I did a short story and did a story for Marvel with Jack. It was like a dream and a nightmare for me to rework those stories in a larger format. I had to go back to one of those scripts in order to change a line, change a letter. It was a great pain because Jack had helped me to create my characters and story. The story was wonderful, but all of that came off as one big jumbled mess. I couldn’t shake the feeling we never saw each other again. I think one of the main things that helped me get over that and help change the course of my life was a good friend of mine named Jack. Jack has some amazing stories and some amazing comics, one of my favorite stories is about a guy named Jack who is a bartender by day and an accountant by night. We became very close friends and would go to comic con together. He’s got books in his library that he’s been collecting for years. He brought me a lot of comics, and I have comics from him. We would read and talk comics and I would watch Jack talk about them. For good or for bad, we’ve stayed friends.

What I want to do is spend most of the interview talking about Jack Pearson- Jack is an amazing friend who has given me an opportunity to share my story and let people know about him. I wish I could spend the whole time talking about my relationship with Jack- that would be great- but you can’t. Jack Pearson just really is a nice dude. I really love his stories and he has told great stories, and

While Bittner’s son, Joe Jr. of Boston, served as secretary of the board during his father’s lifetime, his daughter was the first to leave a significant legacy for them.

She was an attorney in New York City, where she became the first woman to hold the position. Her husband, Robert Bittner, was the company’s president for 20 years and a leading advocate for the health care reform that became law in President Obama’s first term, along with other significant steps toward financial and technological innovation.

Robert Bittner Jr., with his wife, and the first lady’s stepdaughter, are pictured before the company’s annual shareholders meeting in Chicago, Illinois on Thursday, June 13, 2013. (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)

Bittner, 68, began his career as a corporate attorney at the law firm Beal, Bittner, Meyers, & Hagan. Upon graduation from Harvard Business School in 1966, he worked on a number of Wall Street derivatives deals, while also spending time as a consultant to Goldman Sachs when it started trading with a fund of funds called AIG. With his long experience in what would soon become a firm of Wall Street firms, Bittner knew he wanted to move up from his Harvard days and start his own law practice. He also knew that his wife didn’t want his family to have any involvement in a personal business. In 1969, they went into business together, which was initially called the Bittner Law Firm. It had a handful of attorneys, who specialized in a variety of complex and controversial topics: employment law, corporate securities, real estate, civil procedure, consumer and employment law, consumer bankruptcy, and antitrust matters. Among its first clients were Enron. In their early years, the Bittner attorneys were able to handle thousands of cases at once. Over time, Bittner’s corporate practice and Bittner Law Firm had developed a reputation for being one of the firms with the most success in complex, high-stakes cases. His attorneys routinely brought a variety of complex legal issues before the courts, including corporate securities and real estate law, consumer and employment law, personal injury, intellectual property and antitrust matters. Some of the more notable cases of the decade included a $70 billion, $1 billion lawsuit over the sale of Enron securities to a group of Wall Street buyers in 2005 and a $19 billion class action suit against Bank of America over a bank fraud scheme in 2001. Bittner left his former firm in the mid-1990s to set up his own law firm. However, the legal challenges were far more personal for him, as it became clear that his wife, Lisa, was a highly unhappy and controlling individual with whom he was trying to settle their personal differences in 1995. Bittner was already involved with one firm at the time: Bittner, Meyers, & Hagan and his family is related to Bittner via grandmothers. In 1999, Bittner made good on his wife’s wishes to leave behind his law practice and move from New York City to Massachusetts. He made the decision by a phone call from his wife, Lisa, because she seemed ill and was not feeling well. “She said, ‘Bob, look, I’m in the hospital. I’ve just had a heart attack.’” Bittner would return to New York soon, but his wife never returned. As the last years went on, the separation caused Bittner’s family to endure the shockwaves of divorce and loss of a loved one. On July 19, 2001, Bittner flew into Boston to meet with his lawyer and agreed that the division of his assets would take effect by year-end, according to a spokesman for the law firm. Under the terms of the settlement, a series of agreements for Bittner’s assets were arranged, including a 10 percent down payment on the Bittner family home in Quincy, and 10 percent interest in a condominium in Boston’s Back Bay. According to Bittner, his wife’s side of the negotiations would have continued well past January 2014, yet he felt that the law firm had done all it could. “They kept me from seeing my children growing up. They said I was making a false statement about them having custody. I said, ‘What about my daughter, the child that I’ve raised her in a very nurturing and respectful way?’” He was not allowed to see the children as a result. “I was very unhappy. I felt that I wasn’t being given the fair opportunity to say yes or no, to hear, ‘No, no, no.’ I am an asset to my wife, she made me the asset, she has allowed me to make the asset, and of course I was unhappy. I felt, in my heart, I didn’t do what I owed to my children. I think they were, too.” The family did not get their split in the divorce to rest. Despite the bad blood that existed between their marriage

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now

×