entertainment

The idea for an elaborate, slow-burning murder mystery came from a story his friend was having an argument about, a few weeks prior to writing the plot. If you’re not familiar with an overzealous fan , this could be the most exciting thing you’ll see today. When the story was penned, the actor in question was “in a really bad car accident.” When he recovered from his injuries, the actor and his friend ran into someone who was a huge fan of Fred Durst’s work:

One of the earliest clues I remember watching was that Durst had one of his fan boys tell him what their favorite movie of his was. I just thought it was so interesting, but what did it have to do with anything? It just seems odd. So when I first met him, he told me about the guy he’d had this conversation with last, and I thought, ‘why does he keep talking about that guy?’ But as he would reveal, when the show was being prepared my name was never put down in any of the scripts. After the show was over, he told me the name of the fan, and it was never mentioned again. That’s the best I could do, even though it was just a coincidence.

The main character was still a mystery, but the show was being shot in the studio where Fred Durst shot his first film, “Stolen Faces.” In the second episode of the series, the fan and another friend went behind the scenes, and they found a pile of old photos of Freddy Durst sitting on a TV set in the production office in his home. When asked about them, Freddy said he was there before, but that he hadn’t been in the room for a while. The fan asked, “Do you know about the dead body he was sitting on?” Freddy replied, “What I remember is that the body that he was sitting on was real, and I think it was his kid’s”. The guy knew something, so they pulled him and the real Freddy Durst out of the room and got them a ride home. Freddy had done several other shows in the studio and had several children with him; he even got them to cut him some slack, because he wasn’t in the room for at least a year. They ended up going to his home to put them through the ringer, then asked about the body sitting in the office. He said, “She’s the real Freddy Durst, but there’s a dead body in the car I threw away back there.” “You threw away the real one?” “Yeah.”

This is what’s known as “the missing piece” of this whole story - the dead body, one of the few things left out of “Stolen Faces.” It’s just a couple of old photos from the production office; nothing that has anything to do with Freddy Durst or his films . . . Not even a t-shirt, not even a tie. Nothing more. Just another of the many things it would be useful to have onscreen, but it simply doesn’t exist as a key piece. When Fred Durst got home from shooting, the fan wanted to have another conversation with him, but Freddy was in the shower, so he didn’t get to speak. The next day both the fan and Freddy came to his house and asked to take a picture of the head from his old show. Freddie agreed, and sent a photo the next day. The picture, which Freddie took out of rage, included the last few hair on the fan’s head. Although the last hair was removed and the fans head was left with only its neck and head visible . . . but it was still there.

The next day, at Freddy’s house, the fan sent a second picture, this time featuring the last few hair around Freddy’s neck and head. The whole group had to talk about how Freddy was never around the home for at least a year, and if Freddie needed anything, he knew someone was in the studio that night. Freddie asked for pictures of everyone as they sat around all night preparing the next scene, while he sat in the bathtub. Freddie remembered being in a hot tub at some point, so he knew that Freddie never had sex with this woman. He also gave the real Freddy Durst and himself a ride home, and even had the band play “I Wanna Get Lost” out of their van for them (they were great, and Freddie asked to use the same van for his next film). This is how you make up a murder mystery by not letting one member of the group know which dead body is being buried in a closet in a bathroom. Freddie’s murder of the fan was a perfect

(TJ)

I am not the only individual who is looking for solutions to the epidemic of pre-term births. Many parents are in the same situation and have to face unimaginable pain and loss that they don’t want to take on; however, they fear the medical consequences of their pregnancy and not wanting to give birth to a baby that dies. Here is some information and ideas that you might want to think about.

  1. Baby’s Heart Becomes An Island In The Pond

I had heard about the risk that the baby’s heart becomes an island in and around the placenta. Most of the time it causes no harm to the baby in the long run because of the fast pace and the normal blood loss. However, some women report that if the baby’s heart does become an island, the placenta will expel all of the oxygen and nutrients from the baby’s body. In other words, the baby will die in a short amount of time. It is unfortunate that this can happen, but the problem has more to do with the fact that most doctors are still struggling with trying to treat the problem. The problem is still fairly new, but most doctors just don’t yet have a correct treatment for this problem. In most cases the baby is not in danger of dying during the delivery, but his or her oxygen needs are compromised. At this point, a woman might face the decision to have an induced birth to treat the oxygen consumption and nutrient loss. On the other hand, many doctors are now recognizing that taking off the oxygen mask and delivering the baby may be a terrible experience for the mother. In any case, there could be a good chance that the baby will survive the birth, although if he or she is very small, she should take precautions to ensure this won’t occur.

The following is an article that I read about this problem, written by Dr. Peter J. Gammie, DVM (via http://www.livestrong.com/articles/prefpre-f... ).

“The oxygen saturation of the baby’s body will start getting very low as soon as the pre-placental vascular network is complete, and will then reach its lowest point about 2 to 5 hours after the placenta is born. The oxygen saturation will decrease even more gradually over the remainder of the 6-hour perinatal period until about 12 hours after birth. The baby may lose up to 20 percent of his or her blood. The maternal position during birth will significantly increase the risk of loss of blood; the mother and infant have a higher risk of injury from the placenta.”

The following is a video titled “Pre-Placental Hypercapnia: An Unusual Birth” that shows a very interesting phenomenon that occurs in the early stages of labor. My wife and I watched this video and learned that during an induced birth, blood flows from the baby’s ventricles (the largest blood vessels in the body) toward their pulmonary arteries (the small blood vessels). This action would not occur in natural childbirth as the pulmonary artery vessels could not receive much blood flow for about 45 minutes after birth. Later into the labor, the blood pressure of the baby increases while the heart’s pumping action slows down. This can cause the pulmonary artery vessels to dilate and form small holes that allow oxygen and nutrients to be absorbed by the baby’s body. It is important to note that the heart and lungs do not take any action to aid the oxygen consumption/nutrient depletion during birth. The heart continues to pump while oxygen and food are being ingested by the baby. We watched the video and we learned that in order for this event to occur during labor these things would happen. That is to say, the baby’s heart is being squeezed by the placenta’s vascular network. There was a lot of discussion with our family about this phenomenon, but since it is so unique to a natural birth I would like to share it with you. My wife and I watched the video and learned that an important component of this process is that the baby’s blood pressure increases rapidly while he/she is in labor.

One is a dermatologist, who said she’d recommend a “wet and spicy” lip treatment, which would likely involve a cold session in the car and some cream. The other expert is a cosmetic-surgery doctor whom I spoke to and confirmed the method is definitely possible to perform.

“Even if you have a scar, you can’t remove much of the lip,” he told me, adding he has “experienced the procedure done on patients with normal skin.”

The Kardashian case raises, at least, the prospect of lip removal–and with it the possibility of extreme beauty treatments. I’m not yet ready to endorse a product of this nature, but it certainly warrants further study. To keep the possibilities out of the mind of the Kardashian generation, let me direct readers to a related article that is also coming out from L’Oral Paris: “What Makes L’Oral’s ‘Creme Rouge’ Look Great” (Aug. 30, 10am PDT). I can’t quite get over that title. What’s up with this “Creme Rouge” and it’s so-called “superior effect”?

At the very least, if a Kardashian-Jenner marriage ever did get off the ground (which it will very likely), there is speculation among the public that Kardashian would never see his younger sister (now 27 years old) on the red carpet again. Or more accurately, that she would. In the world of celebrity psychology, you can be just as narcissistic…or at the very least as manipulative…as the paparazzi. Afterall, her father was a “monster.” They may have had things to drink in the hotel room during a recent trip to LA , but they certainly hadn’t taken out the trash on the pool. “And we had the whole experience at L.A. with the paparazzi…and they were right there to take my picture, even though they were a few days away from their wedding,” Kardashian-Jenner said last week . “That was when I started thinking to myself, ‘Am I ready to take my sister’s picture in public? Because I’m not.’”

The reality of the situation is that a paparazzi invasion would likely be the least of her worries. With the Kardashian family now at the height of their fame in New York’s West Village over a year and the reality TV show in full swing, the public might see Jenner as her real-life counterpart in another kind of reality, especially amongst the Kardashian brood. If she does indeed, or has already, gotten out “somewhere,” some of the older generation of Kardashians will have a say in whether the Kardashian-Jenner brood makes or breaks their future. A new movie in the works, starring Kris Jenner and Kendall Jenner, is already under way. We’ll see. Update: Read my original piece on Khloe Kardashian’s “beautiful” lips from Sept. 5, 2011. And I have not been alone in my comments on this story. Kardashian, 36, has deleted her Twitter account and stopped responding to all my messages, even at the rate of one a day. So, my first response might not be the best to my reader. But I suppose I should try one more time. Thanks. UPDATE: I have finally received a statement from Khloe Kardashian: Here is a translation of the “official” statement.

“The above picture is a very sensitive one, with many parts, as I’m not used to having such things in my life. I can only say that it is a very difficult day for me and my family. I am truly sorry to everyone that has known me for years and all whom I love. And to all the people who love me!

I was working in L.A. where I did a lot of fun stuff and went a lot of places with my family. It is a very challenging time for my family, but at the same time it is the most exciting time I have ever had in my life to share my love for them with people.” UPDATE: In a new interview, Kardashian-Jenner said she plans to be in New York for the awards show, as the New York Post reported Wednesday morning . She also has plans to open her house and the couple is hoping to have a wedding there in October.

One is a dermatologist, who said she’d recommend a “wet and spicy” lip treatment, which would likely involve a cold session in the car and some cream. The other expert is a cosmetic-surgery doctor whom I spoke to and confirmed the method is definitely possible to perform.

“Even if you have a scar, you can’t remove much of the lip,” he told me, adding he has “experienced the procedure done on patients with normal skin.”

The Kardashian case raises, at least, the prospect of lip removal–and with it the possibility of extreme beauty treatments. I’m not yet ready to endorse a product of this nature, but it certainly warrants further study. To keep the possibilities out of the mind of the Kardashian generation, let me direct readers to a related article that is also coming out from L’Oral Paris: “What Makes L’Oral’s ‘Creme Rouge’ Look Great” (Aug. 30, 10am PDT). I can’t quite get over that title. What’s up with this “Creme Rouge” and it’s so-called “superior effect”?

At the very least, if a Kardashian-Jenner marriage ever did get off the ground (which it will very likely), there is speculation among the public that Kardashian would never see his younger sister (now 27 years old) on the red carpet again. Or more accurately, that she would. In the world of celebrity psychology, you can be just as narcissistic…or at the very least as manipulative…as the paparazzi. Afterall, her father was a “monster.” They may have had things to drink in the hotel room during a recent trip to LA , but they certainly hadn’t taken out the trash on the pool. “And we had the whole experience at L.A. with the paparazzi…and they were right there to take my picture, even though they were a few days away from their wedding,” Kardashian-Jenner said last week . “That was when I started thinking to myself, ‘Am I ready to take my sister’s picture in public? Because I’m not.’”

The reality of the situation is that a paparazzi invasion would likely be the least of her worries. With the Kardashian family now at the height of their fame in New York’s West Village over a year and the reality TV show in full swing, the public might see Jenner as her real-life counterpart in another kind of reality, especially amongst the Kardashian brood. If she does indeed, or has already, gotten out “somewhere,” some of the older generation of Kardashians will have a say in whether the Kardashian-Jenner brood makes or breaks their future. A new movie in the works, starring Kris Jenner and Kendall Jenner, is already under way. We’ll see. Update: Read my original piece on Khloe Kardashian’s “beautiful” lips from Sept. 5, 2011. And I have not been alone in my comments on this story. Kardashian, 36, has deleted her Twitter account and stopped responding to all my messages, even at the rate of one a day. So, my first response might not be the best to my reader. But I suppose I should try one more time. Thanks. UPDATE: I have finally received a statement from Khloe Kardashian: Here is a translation of the “official” statement.

“The above picture is a very sensitive one, with many parts, as I’m not used to having such things in my life. I can only say that it is a very difficult day for me and my family. I am truly sorry to everyone that has known me for years and all whom I love. And to all the people who love me!

I was working in L.A. where I did a lot of fun stuff and went a lot of places with my family. It is a very challenging time for my family, but at the same time it is the most exciting time I have ever had in my life to share my love for them with people.” UPDATE: In a new interview, Kardashian-Jenner said she plans to be in New York for the awards show, as the New York Post reported Wednesday morning . She also has plans to open her house and the couple is hoping to have a wedding there in October.

The idea for an elaborate, slow-burning murder mystery came from a story his friend was having an argument about, a few weeks prior to writing the plot. If you’re not familiar with an overzealous fan , this could be the most exciting thing you’ll see today. When the story was penned, the actor in question was “in a really bad car accident.” When he recovered from his injuries, the actor and his friend ran into someone who was a huge fan of Fred Durst’s work:

One of the earliest clues I remember watching was that Durst had one of his fan boys tell him what their favorite movie of his was. I just thought it was so interesting, but what did it have to do with anything? It just seems odd. So when I first met him, he told me about the guy he’d had this conversation with last, and I thought, ‘why does he keep talking about that guy?’ But as he would reveal, when the show was being prepared my name was never put down in any of the scripts. After the show was over, he told me the name of the fan, and it was never mentioned again. That’s the best I could do, even though it was just a coincidence.

The main character was still a mystery, but the show was being shot in the studio where Fred Durst shot his first film, “Stolen Faces.” In the second episode of the series, the fan and another friend went behind the scenes, and they found a pile of old photos of Freddy Durst sitting on a TV set in the production office in his home. When asked about them, Freddy said he was there before, but that he hadn’t been in the room for a while. The fan asked, “Do you know about the dead body he was sitting on?” Freddy replied, “What I remember is that the body that he was sitting on was real, and I think it was his kid’s”. The guy knew something, so they pulled him and the real Freddy Durst out of the room and got them a ride home. Freddy had done several other shows in the studio and had several children with him; he even got them to cut him some slack, because he wasn’t in the room for at least a year. They ended up going to his home to put them through the ringer, then asked about the body sitting in the office. He said, “She’s the real Freddy Durst, but there’s a dead body in the car I threw away back there.” “You threw away the real one?” “Yeah.”

This is what’s known as “the missing piece” of this whole story - the dead body, one of the few things left out of “Stolen Faces.” It’s just a couple of old photos from the production office; nothing that has anything to do with Freddy Durst or his films . . . Not even a t-shirt, not even a tie. Nothing more. Just another of the many things it would be useful to have onscreen, but it simply doesn’t exist as a key piece. When Fred Durst got home from shooting, the fan wanted to have another conversation with him, but Freddy was in the shower, so he didn’t get to speak. The next day both the fan and Freddy came to his house and asked to take a picture of the head from his old show. Freddie agreed, and sent a photo the next day. The picture, which Freddie took out of rage, included the last few hair on the fan’s head. Although the last hair was removed and the fans head was left with only its neck and head visible . . . but it was still there.

The next day, at Freddy’s house, the fan sent a second picture, this time featuring the last few hair around Freddy’s neck and head. The whole group had to talk about how Freddy was never around the home for at least a year, and if Freddie needed anything, he knew someone was in the studio that night. Freddie asked for pictures of everyone as they sat around all night preparing the next scene, while he sat in the bathtub. Freddie remembered being in a hot tub at some point, so he knew that Freddie never had sex with this woman. He also gave the real Freddy Durst and himself a ride home, and even had the band play “I Wanna Get Lost” out of their van for them (they were great, and Freddie asked to use the same van for his next film). This is how you make up a murder mystery by not letting one member of the group know which dead body is being buried in a closet in a bathroom. Freddie’s murder of the fan was a perfect

The couple, who have been together since 1999, made the move across the Channel to Surrey in the summer of 2013. For the past eight years, the pair have made it at regular intervals from Ballyman, England to London Heathrow in Greater London. They also have been living in Windsor, where the couple now live. When Prince Bill finally made the move to Halifax, last April, he took with him the two young British expats (they were only 23) to their place in Surrey. “There were literally 40 or so people there, and I’d just say the best parts are that it was very calm, not so loud, the children were still in the playpen and they were doing their training and doing things,” Prince Harry recently told The Times over the phone from his home in Windsor. “My older brother, who is also from Windsor, gave me a call so I can take him to Halifax when I’m back here [next month]. It’s been quite a good thing at school, it shows there’s a lot of people with a real good life plan . “By now we’ve made it to Halifax already and then we will make it back. So we’ve got two other plans in mind to see which part of the country is going to hold us over.”

The Prince Harrys started making the move to Windsor in February of ‘14. But what they discovered in the country’s smallest town after graduating was incredible: the entire state of Windsor had a population of just 13,500. The numbers are all the more impressive given that it can be estimated that Windsor has two counties, with the rest subdividing into two major urban areas: The Great Marlborough County and the Northern Counties. The largest metropolitan area within Windsor, they claim, is the eastern half of the city; but it’s only been about a year since the country’s first wave of immigrants arrived. It’s hard to see how anyone could ever predict that by 2000, if the population increased to a whopping 740,000 altogether, Windsor would still be here, with 4-and-a-half million residents. In other words, only the largest city is truly representative of rural life, and that’s true for much of eastern northern Ontario, too. So here’s what Prince Harry found when he drove to Birmingham, where he took the same route he did on August 7, 2017:

This video shows George’s departure to Windsor where he met his future wife, Ann. In this video released yesterday, George is shown having a look at his new home which is located just a kilomet north of Windsor’s city centre.

The Prince Harrys moved to Windsor in May of 2016 and have been living in the home for a time. After getting an offer from a local company to become involved in Windsor, they moved to Ballyman in May in order to bring in more immigrants. This spring, as part of their initial round-up process, they moved back to Windsor but didn’t see a lot of opportunity.

The new Prince Harrys, who met Ann in November of ‘08 and married, found jobs playing video games for the first time in several years. And the couple were living in the Windsor city centre, living on the north end of a street, with a full-priced Bedouin condo.

It didn’t take long before the whole city had an interest in us - and we’ll miss our friends in Windsor and the surrounding world. It’s just an unfortunate case of coincidence that we, as a group, have so many children who grew up in Windsor, living comfortably in our small apartment complex (which is what Prince Harry and Ann grew up in) with our three tiny children on top of their parents, with their two grown sons (who are now grown up in this apartment and live very independently), and our two small sisters. In addition to providing support for the little one to get to and from school, we are incredibly, deeply proud of our amazing community and they are such wonderful people. We all remember how we were all such great friends along the way. “We all want to be a part of something big,” said Prince Harry. “It’s pretty exciting. I miss my country. It’s a part of Canada, and it’s like being on the moon. I love seeing that.”

When Prince Harry was finally ready to settle down, he was in Hamilton, just 5 hours from his house in the Greater North end of Windsor and the largest English speaking city in Britain. He also attended School College for Boys (now part of Hogg’s College, Oxford) and served in the Royal Canadian Air Force.

As many as 1,000 people showed up for his first birthday celebration for the rest of his life. We remember having the pleasure of telling Prince Harry that there was an event so close to us that day - and that he didn’t remember, “when we were all

Well that’s probably what happened here, but all of this has all gone a little too far with the last two. It should have been pretty clear right off the bat, but even in a few words, “Hellboy” and “The Golden Army” don’t really hold the bag. Seriously, the first half of the film is downright awful.

The Last Unicorn (1977) The first film went into low key territory with it’s first teaser, an impromptu “Bollywood-ish” of sort where you hear what I mean. This “Bollywood-ish” is what makes the movie all the more disappointing. What it lacks in the film, in some ways, it makes up for in the fact that its main characters are both weird and terrible. (My own reaction to this film may have skewed my own judgment, but they were better than “The Golden Army”). If you don’t like a film with “bad,” or “creepy,” or anything resembling that, or you just haven’t gotten anything to latch on to or want to watch “Bollywood,” then you might like the first half of the movie to a less terrible extent. I was pretty relieved to see that they didn’t spend any time on a new one on the old slate, but that is another story – and a little bad for my stomach.

The Last Unicorn (1986) I thought I’d cover this one again by talking about the two recent sequels, The First and The Last. I know these three are not much newer films and have some good things to say about them, but they’ve recently dropped and all, especially the ones at the same time. Some people didn’t even want to watch the third one. But I think the reasons are simple. Both are bad, but both are terrible. The bad thing is that they are both terrible. Both are horrible, but they are terrible together. Which, in retrospect, is the biggest shame of this film right now, because the third movie is a very bad film. I’m pretty sure it was bad enough that the director would have said it was awful had I not worked on it. I mean, I really don’t know if all the trailers mentioned in all this talk was true. Well that’s probably what happened: The final film went in, and it had an unusually deep impression. It was bad enough to almost be a disaster, but it was as bad as when they made a “Bollywood Sesame Street Christmas Special” in 1997. It failed to make out much of a dent in both the appeal and the quality of the film. So, given the fact that I remember this film well, I was happy to see it go for only a few dollars and never play a dime.

The First and The Last (1994) Here’s where most criticism begins. Did I mention that both films were pretty bad? No, not really. They were far from terrible, but they were far from mediocre. The problem for me, more than any other moment in the post-production, was that these films failed to deliver the kind of visceral experience they’ve both failed to deliver: I can’t even describe how upset I am that I didn’t watch the first movie with my friends. I actually gave them a lot of blame, which was nice (I don’t recall getting one of these movies back, honestly, I had a weird feeling about it after the first one). I also remember myself saying to myself, “I’m going to hate it when these two crap out of control crap movies suck.” The fact of the matter is, the first two films were terrible – it should be no surprise that they were awful. Just sayin’. In my opinion, they were good. I don’t think that’s a mistake, though. They were better than anything they’ve ever tried in one of their films. What’s even more amazing is that in my experience, they definitely deserve credit for this, which is another reason I won’t feel like I’ve forgotten about these and anything like that at all (again, not an accident).

The Final Days (1988) “How To Get Away With Murder” is my absolute favorite film of all time, even with all its shortcomings. I guess that’s what makes “How To Get Away With Murder” so special. It’s the kind of film that’s not an average horror film that has to do the same thing every time it’s shown. It’s the kind of film that has to be shown to people like John Hurt, or Scott Glenn, or David Cronenberg, or even Paul W. David Cronenberg . and David Cron. and

I have made this case to all law enforcers and regulators as part of a growing fight that seeks to save taxpayers dollars which, even with all our legal resources, have never been better spent elsewhere . After much deliberation and negotiation, I am pleased to announce that I am ready to sue over $60 million dollars from the podcast company KEEP IN TOUCH as part of an ongoing legal action against the makers of KEEP IN TOUCH for conspiring to prevent a podcast podcast company from operating on the KEEP IN TOUCH (KEEP IN TOUCH is a trademark of KEEP IN TOUCH Holdings LLC). I have called on all involved parties to make clear that if this was true I would be extremely disappointed. Also, I want to emphasize that I will not seek damages or otherwise any legal recourse against the podcasting and podcasting technology providers themselves. This issue should be addressed in a broad, civil, and equitable manner. In this case, the law enforcers and regulators have taken legal action. My decision was based on the facts and circumstances of this matter. I cannot accept compensation for their actions without the proper authority, or consent from KEEP IN TOUCH, and will not continue to support a podcast company using a copyright infringement technique and content which infringes on the KEEP IN TOUCH and the public interest in this matter.

A few other issues arise:

If the copyright owners had legal authority to use an infringing song they knew and loved (or wished they did) and even had an offer that I had signed and agreed with, how would I know whether to block or cancel the service? How much for the cost of the hosting? How would I be protected against any of these legal fees and expenses if I did not sue? I cannot believe that any of these issues could be addressed in a way that would reduce the profits, profits and profits of the podcasting and podcasting technology providers. I expect that my lawsuit will be dismissed on appeal. ____

In a nutshell: this case was filed on March 21, 2012. I have stated my concerns to the Commission regarding the content provided to me in this podcast and that the fact that a small but vocal group from KEEP IN TOUCH has organized a group with the aim to prevent me from accessing the podcast, and that my use of KEEP IN TOUCH is an indication of their intent and that they have no intention of using the original work from my podcast. I hereby demand payment from KEEP IN TOUCH, on the first day of the broadcast, and additional royalties from the KEEP IN TOUCH, on the following day. These would consist of fees, attorney’s fees, legal costs, and punitive damages. The costs of my personal legal team with my services will be paid directly to KEEP IN TOUCH, and will increase the costs of my own lawyers to defend the podcast company and the podcast company’s copyright infringement and other business practices. KEEP IN TOUCH will be able to reimburse me for fees, attorneys’ fees, attorney’s fees for my lawyers covering legal fees and court costs related to this lawsuit, and will provide a legal indemnity as a part of the service. In all all, I would ask the Commission to promptly address my lawsuit concerning the use of the original work given in this podcast.


We are in a new time. This is one where the first question we ask one’s first spouse is, “I really wanted to speak English.” And, as anyone who knows me knows, I am English, I want to give you some answers:

“As long as I am in a position of leadership we all do it the best we can, especially when the situation challenges, I can’t speak no English at all.” You hear all this in the news lately over the Chinese crisis and the fact that the Dalai Lama’s group that claims responsibility for the Tibetan exodus who has been exiled was very much in Tibet, not just in British Columbia or Canada but also on the Western Front in both. To see how much trouble it really is to speak and to get a new voice from within the church because we don’t speak Chinese? One woman in the audience and a group of people say I said to her “I want you to let me speak to others. I will talk to you as if I have met you, and you need to be in some way, shape or form of communication with me.” And that means a lot of things and I said “What if it was because you left Tibet, you didn’t have your voice?” So, that is why I wanted the whole thing to stop. I thought, why don’t you teach you the right way to have your voice come from people in good standing here in the Church? That is what I wanted to have. The whole problem of this story of Tibetan people coming to India or Tibet, the situation is not that there were not Tibetan people, for what’s being stated, the vast majority of Indian people lived a very nice life in China all over, but they had no voice. The reason for this that the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan movement tried so hard in China, did it not make sense? The Tibetans in this country that don’t speak Indian language, for them the most important aspect of their lives they have no voice. The reason why that is, and I believe these so called Dalai Lama’s and Tibetan movement are trying to make that very important, I think that it made sense to speak and to get it to my people. If I were to say that Indian voice of the soul of mine is not speaking their language they would tell me. If I were to say then they still don’t come, maybe no one is talking to anybody, maybe no one has to go where they should and there is an urgent need and it needs to be addressed in some way.” What you do may not even have been said before but you don’t have to answer me and so you are left answering questions

Some people are saying that there is some spiritual thing happening and it is not happening at international conferences. Maybe there are some spiritualists, and they use Tibetan language that is more in line with Tibetan people than your own, but I believe it is just going on in the Tibetan world that it is happening, and how do we talk about it? Like I said, when will all the Tibetan people take a position such as that and, I guess, I would hope not just a group of people that they should stay as long as they can from what they do there would understand what is at stake. Even as part of a good leadership such as those that I have spoken to, who do I trust who will be on the side and what’s happening inside Tibetan society? I would hope they have not changed their view of the question that is coming up every day in this whole world over the question of Tibetan people.

But I think that the Tibetan community don’t see this thing or that thing, that there is something that is happening and everybody needs to come together as a team or a group to try and be a part of what is happening. Even now as I do the Dalai Lama said just a question that I would ask, for all the people to know that there was an attack just out of North America and then the fact that it happened in North America just because China had just declared a moratorium. A month after and the fact that Chinese had declared a moratorium that I think we have all seen in Nepal. Then from the U.s. they got a bit more than that and they called that an attack that was totally real and, it all changed. They did not have a ban on the attacks in North America.

At this point, I don’t know what they can do or why. It happens sometimes that if they get on the case for a one minute, a few days is enough. But in general, if something happens outside of an extended period of time I don’t know. Because I would hope that the other side will not see anything and, from that I think the fact that they have done in North America and people do not mind because there was a lot of pressure and there was a lot of goodwill and I have heard an apology for the actions but I don’t think that this is something that in fact they will give them the full leadership

When one user wrote to her online in response to the show, “This is so gross,” she was quick to respond, “I’m sorry, that’s hilarious, I just want to thank all of these people online and the folks that have helped out in terms of helping me to talk to people about suicide, and help me better realize that I’m not making excuses because we didn’t ask these questions to the users at the start of the show. We need to be able to be ourselves again. We’re not just talking about it now, but how we’re going to react later in the season and get it over with for people like YouTuber Bongman or the fans that took umbrage at my character’s characterization.” Turner, who is a member of the podcast community and a contributor to a variety of online forums and podcasts for show and website audiences, hopes other commenters have learned through their experiences, and it’s only fitting. “So every one out there out there is more than a little bit of knowledge, but every person’s an individual,” she says. “It’s not always on this list but every one of you know that I had fun playing my characters off the ground, and I think the people who have shared the knowledge probably have better ideas about how we can come up with real, meaningful solutions to this, just do the right thing and stay together.” It’s not hard for one to think about Turner’s time on “Game of Thrones,” and her time on “Downton Abbey” was, in a lot of ways, an exercise in human interaction. “All my life I’ve thought about how this show could use a really small amount of people in our world to solve some huge problems,” Turner says. “I know that I’ve had people tell me that my character, because she’s so powerful and beautiful in the show and so selfless and the person who would do anything that the show would do, should be given a role that’s bigger than the role my characters actually do. But these are real people. They don’t look like us. They don’t have complex and different motivations and motives. Their only motivations are their own.” Turner’s passion for television brought her to television as a child. “I’m not saying that it was what it should be, but my childhood had given me the greatest sense of self and an ability to make decisions for my own benefit,” she says. “I think that because of the people I knew, in my personal life and in the books… my character could go and do a thing, and, even if it did not work out, that was how I would want it to be in me.” With that motivation came great and true responsibility for what led up to that decision, even if not with the characters and events of actual episodes. As the show’s series progressed, Turner moved on from the books and turned her attention to other parts of the character. “I think I still felt very free to be whatever I wanted to be and I think it’s really exciting to have people who are as open and honest about their reactions to what may be happening to them as I have been and as I’ve been a part of so many stories,” Turner says. “I’m lucky enough to have somebody who feels as though they can be anything they choose.

“I’m fortunate enough to have somebody who feels as though they can be anything they choose.”

When I ask Turner how she feels about having a third TV show on the air? “My personal situation is so different from what I would find on other shows,” Turner says to chuckles. “I’d say I’d find that my family is different from TV shows. It’s more about what I feel in others. My family and everybody I’ve touched, people I’ve made friends with, my friends who have put in a lot of time and effort, are just, because I can and I feel so much love and affection for them and even support them even now, that it’s so much more difficult to connect with people than be with anything else.” She adds, “That’s really why ‘Game of Thrones,’ you know where we were, so many things about who we were as a family, that made us really happy. I’d love to see something made that doesn’t all fit neatly into the same kind of genre. But I honestly think, if we could do something that would reflect the characters, then there would be a real audience, and that would be great.”

What do we know about how TV is impacting the health of this country this summer? For Turner, it’s just about the most powerful shift she’s ever seen. “We’re doing something that’s not limited to sports, but will ultimately impact all those other things, the health of the planet,” she says. “Obviously we’re making a lot of TV out of just showing the world around, but it was just so important to give people from all sorts of different viewpoints, different perspectives a chance.”

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now

×