The government’s main goal today is to prevent further spread and to find those who have come into contact with infected people from other countries. The CDC’s latest infection trend report is below:

CDC 2013

Drilling in and under ground:

To find new reservoirs of infection, the CDC will spend $500 million over the next two years to develop a new technique to look in and under the ground to check for new clusters of infection in the U.S. The process involves drilling 4-wheel-drive vehicles into the ground with cameras, and sampling the chemicals they find as they go.

These drill rigs can then be transported to a remote site and tested for contamination from surface and subsurface sources, such as wastewater, waste-water treatment plants, or chemical plants. This testing was done in August of last year, and the CDC is already looking to do it again in early 2013. A total of 6,600 different samples of soil from nearly 24 states were sent out for testing, and all found a positive signal. The drill technology itself is being developed at the University of Cincinnati’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. The data gathered from the wells is then analyzed to estimate which plants and materials have been exposed to the chemicals and whether contamination will spread further. The samples will then be screened for pathogens on an industrial scale that can cause illness, so if a significant amount has been found, it will be treated with disinfectant to kill such pathogens.

The process might cost $50,000,000 to do - a fact that will probably force the CDC to look elsewhere, as a total of $900,000,000 was budgeted for this research in the last budget. If it doesn’t end up being enough, however, the CDC could eventually need to look at developing these same techniques in the United States. In any case, the research is being funded by the CDC to find a way to better detect and take care of these new infections, but this is exactly what has gotten it into trouble before. This is in addition to the $1 Billion cost the CDC initially allocated to researching Zika in the U.S.. In that case, the idea was to identify how viruses like Zika spread from person to person by using biologicals, but that turned out to be a much more complex task with lots of different and different pathogens. It’s hard to imagine the same kind of science being able to identify and manage new pathogens like this one.

In the past, the researchers who made Zika into such a global public health crisis have been the ones who discovered new viruses, but it now looks like the only ones making new antibodies are scientists in the U.S. The public is currently not at the table of who the scientists are working for, and they don’t seem to care. Instead, the focus is on studying them to see if they can be used to treat an already-patented vaccine, and that appears to be what we’re going to be hearing a lot more of.

As far as I’m concerned, he should be prosecuted and fined for lying to the press to advance his own political agenda. That is not acceptable, but his political and ideological views should not stand in the way of free speech. In fact I believe that, in a free society his political and ideological views should be protected by the First Amendment. I think he should be punished for those views which have caused so much suffering and death. He should not only be punished for that, but he should be made an example of, made to suffer for their deeds. In the spirit of the American ideals of freedom of religion or belief of any other faith or none, I do not hate or vilify or consider him or his views repugnant to the principles of any of our laws, but I will not support any politician, person, or organization that chooses in the name of either Christianity or non-Christians to support the prosecution of him for making such a false statement. As many Americans, myself included, have long known, I think of him as a real life, real life and real life hero.

Bobby Kennedy was one of the most highly decorated Americans in the history of the country. His life was spent fighting for the rights of the children and families. As he grew older and became more politically involved, much of his political support came from left-wing liberals who were concerned that his liberal support for equal rights and civil liberties would make him the target of the right wing. And he fought that right wing in Congress and in the courts throughout his political career. In 1980 when Kennedy was elected to the Senate, his Democratic opponent, John Tower, ran a highly negative campaign against him. As I look back on his legacy and his political history in America, I do not believe that he should be charged criminally for his statements to a reporter, the press nor indeed for the actions that he took as he carried out his duties during his tenure in the Senate – not to mention he clearly violated the law by disclosing classified information in a public forum. Perhaps it was not his intent to do so and he failed to disclose certain information that his boss may have deemed relevant to his duties in the Senate. But because of who he was, I can see why the media would want it kept secret. I do think that, in some ways his politics are more conservative than many of us, and he was on the wrong side of a great number of issues that have had a significant impact on my own political philosophy, but his right to speak his mind and think freely has been an essential element of our democracy.

As I look at his role as a U.S. Senator and as his decision to support the war in Vietnam, where he fought and where he came to support a certain cause, I cannot help but think that our government’s actions in all areas of our world are in stark contrast to both the U.S. Constitution and the fundamental ideas of the Declaration of Independence. Indeed, for example, I personally would never vote for a president to be elected by the U.S. Senate, not only for me as a supporter of the concept of limited government but for a number of reasons. These are not things I seek to defend or attack, but rather something for which we as Americans, as Americans, must learn how to properly manage the government so that it maintains the integrity of its institutions, the freedom of its citizens and their civil rights. And perhaps I am mistaken, but I can see no alternative but to see a change in strategy for our leaders, rather than an end in itself. It must, for example, be evident in some way that the U.S. Government is changing directions from that of unlimited government. We must try to do what we can to make clear that our government is not operating as something that is just for the interests of a small number of special interests, but rather must work to bring the interests and rights of everyone to the fore.

There are examples of all sorts of public servants who have faced legal consequences for their actions. In a recent case we reviewed the actions of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in a court case where they were being prosecuted. In the case of the EPA, we were interested in the role that a court can play when it is given jurisdiction to determine whether to sanction a federal agency. Because the EPA is an agency of the U.S. Government, it’s own authority was not a factor before the court determined that the Obama administration was wrong in denying a permit to a well that would cause an estimated $4 billion in damage to a California waterway. After that decision all the way through the federal courts, the EPA was the only agency to file legal arguments to overturn the decision, and they won and won and won in court and with the courts, as the judges explained why they ruled against the agency. We also reviewed in that case the

The sale of the drug became legal on January 1st and was the biggest day for sales in the state, eclipsing Colorado’s unofficial holiday, April Fools’ Day. “You’d be hard pressed to tell a pothead from a jaywalker around this time,” said Denver Mayor Michael Hancock at a press conference announcing the law. He didn’t clarify if “jaywalkers” were recreational users or medical patients. We’ve seen some of what’s described as “marijuana in marijuana” before, but it is still a novelty that has never come to be more than an amusing thing. But when I spoke Monday, I found it difficult to find much excitement or sympathy for the issue in Denver. The city now has, for the first time in its history, a serious chance of becoming the first in the nation to legalize recreational pot or at least to control its sale and make advertising and sales legal. Last month, we saw how difficult the city’s politics were when state lawmakers and state officials lined up to condemn the city’s medical marijuana dispensaries. Then Denver passed a charter amendment that allows, but not requires, cannabis consumption on public property by anyone over 21. Now people are lining up to buy pot in a way that we don’t normally see in real estate. “I bought a home for sale on Tuesday,” one prospective buyer said in a sales pitch. As for the legal weed, some people apparently think that by selling recreational marijuana, the city is doing its part to stop the black market. Denver’s marijuana will soon be sold online at its website, a sign that the city is putting its best foot forward for the public sector to help regulate and control the use of the drug. But the city’s business leaders are not trying to get out in front of the issue of legalization by selling marijuana; they’re interested in keeping their cannabis monopoly. In their sales pitch, they’re saying, and I quote that “We need to keep our license. We just need to put it there.” I spoke again with Jason Zengerle, Colorado’s director of marijuana policy, on Monday he has been in charge of the city’s marijuana policy for the few short months that the law has been on the books, but was put in place by Mayor Hancock after the decision on the charter. He seemed frustrated about the idea of recreational can. Now he’s frustrated because the public can’t get a better handle on what they can or can’t buy or possess on Colorado soil and he hopes they can get a better handle on what they can and can’t consume. He’s a big advocate of the charter amendment, and he has a hard time imagining himself as a person who would sell marijuana online, or if they want to have it, be out in public, smoking it, but he also has a harder time seeing himself as a person who would sell marijuana for money. When I asked Zengerle to clarify the role of his city, the answer was simple he can’t answer. So here’s a longer answer for my readers about the legal side of the legalization of marijuana. The city of Denver is a government entity that manages a lot of public property around the city limits, among them its own water supply and sewer. Denver’s recreational pot sale is strictly a municipal matter. The city does provide certain permits for dispensaries that use marijuana to supplement their sales. The city offers $250 licenses that are good for six months, though some are renewable. That is part of the reason why people are starting in Denver a lot earlier to buy marijuana for consumption on public property. Because it only sells marijuana, not medical marijuana, the city also is selling an amount of the drug that is twice as high as what doctors prescribe and that is one factor in Colorado setting the legal limit, on a state-by-state basis. The city still has the same restrictions when it comes to keeping marijuana out of the hands of minors.

Posted by Stuff Black People Don’t Like at 8:44 PM

Davey Crockett said…

Davey Crockett said…

Anonymous said… this comment has been removed by the author. I am surprised at the number of people who have been “tried” in a “deal gone bad”. I think its the dumb laws, no matter when being used, or even if the person is actually guilty, that make these kind of people go berserk. I think having a stupid law, doesn’t make any difference. Just like if Bill Clinton or Bill Ford would have been fined every time he brought a gun to a school. They are “tried” in the same same way. They are not even a good example. How many times have I seen them say they are sorry to anyone in their family that knows them to be on drugs? If you can not look at this without just wanting to tell me

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke had a clear message to all investors on Tuesday, saying that the Fed is actively planning to enter a market-friendly interest rate policy after its latest financial crisis policy committee meeting in two weeks. Federal Reserve chair Janet Yellen appeared at a press conference in Washington with Bernanke. Bernanke used the call as a chance to try and put the Fed’s financial problems behind the Fed’s recent rise in interest rates.

Tobin Smith takes a look at one of the most famous fictional financial stories in cinematic history in an episode of his “Fahrenheit 7.9.”

A new study commissioned by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) reveals a glaring omission in the regulatory oversight of the financial crisis.

A paper titled “The Coming Bank Depressions” has been presented by economist James Glass as the latest economic analysis of the US banking system.

In the latest US national poll by Bloomberg News, Americans remain more supportive of the Obama administration’s economic stimulus program and have more confidence in the Federal Reserve.

Here, the two have found a common ground for the first time since the 1920s and have turned to the Internet to chart the American economy. They hope their work will inform one another. The Federal Reserve Board and Federal Reserve Banks. I hope that the recent financial crisis will prompt both of them to take some more aggressive action. They’ve already done a lot of damage. I am concerned about them at this very moment. But we have to be worried about other players. That’s our job. The two have started the conversation of what to do about our large corporations. They know there can be no return on the money that these titans have pumped into the economy. I am worried about this too. If there is no answer for them it is just a matter of time before the economy goes south.

I know what you are thinking. “It’s easy to write a column about how little there is for the economy and its people. But it could also be true.” It’s definitely true in that regard. But the two pieces have also gone on to say something very different. “So what’s up with Wall Street’s obsession with profit and greed?” “It’s never been a better time for the Wall Street types.” “A $75 billion loss on Wall Street might get as much press as a $100 billion one.” As you can see, the two don’t agree. And neither does anyone else on the web. I’ll give you examples. If you go to their website’s discussion board you’ll quickly see the discussion is dominated by self-absorbed, narcissistic and borderline deranged “traders” shouting about how they make $800,000 a year. “Everyone is doing the same thing. Every company is making this money doing the same thing.” “The stock market is rigged at every stage.” If you go to the Fed’s website you’ll quickly find themselves discussing how their decisions to do nothing was bad for the people in the Fed. They said just what the big corporations seem to think, that they were bad for the economy and that it was unfair. “I want answers, some of us have been asking the question since last fall.”

But they didn’t stop there, they went on to say what they could think about things with the stock markets. Of course, those decisions were good for the U.S. economy. The Fed had created the conditions for the country to recover, have better and longer lives. So why couldn’t the big businesses make as much money? The answer is why the Fed did not act; its job was to keep the money flowing and make sure it didn’t collapse in price. (Those big corporations were making their money on the backs of workers, too…but that’s another story.) So what about corporations’ profits? They are, after all, a profit center. They are why people buy products and why the economy is so stable and prosperous. And, according to those two, there’s nothing wrong with them.

“In the absence-of-the-Fed, the banks are not going to stop looting. It is their money, too much of it.” “We can’t trust anyone to come in there and clean the place up. So let them work their way through Washington.” “What’s wrong with allowing them to do that? We are not going to let them do what they want.” And by the way, most of the big corporations make only 5% of what they claimed they made. If that was a percentage of an average person’s life, it would say something. But it’s not. It’s just the top 10 or so. And they are not going to stop there. They will try and screw you over and take your money. The Fed has no control over the profits of the big companies. That’s their money. It’s all theirs. It all comes from the Fed. The big corporations are in bed with the Fed, just like the Republicans are in bed with Wall Street. They aren’t just banking on the Federal Reserve to save their worthless businesses. They’re banking on the Fed to take away your money. They are banking on you to fail. So they need you. As you could see from the two pieces, their work has already done the world a great deal of good. Even if it didn’t. But now it’s time to pay them back; do some good for the economy. It’s good of the Fed and Wall Street, why not? If it helps, perhaps that would be the biggest payment they could hope for: to do something for the people and for this planet. They could still leave it out of their next column. But if the world’s biggest corporations and the second biggest financial centers can’t help a friend and fellow planet, then where can they?

“Well, it’s not just corporate greed. It’s also human greed.” They make sure to bring out the human greed at the end of both pieces. Let’s look at corporate greed in this economy:

The companies don

I believe it’s what allows each man to experience his own self-knowledge in a way he hadn’t before the idea of you can become something other than who you were supposed to be. All this says to me is that even if you never truly know what it is to be alive, you can still be part of an experience much larger than yourself. When you are in control of your own life, your time and your energy, you never know what it’s going to be like whether you get that first kiss or you are the woman who wins a beauty contest on television and no one wants to be the one to give them the trophy, you never know. You can’t be sure! And when you accept that no one else can tell you who you are, as long as you choose to be, what a sense of control you feel. I’ve seen this all before, of course of course it will happen! And the more you can be in control of your life even if just during the moment the more you will feel like you are yourself. In fact, that could even lead to a real joy an experience of what you would call ‘loving yourself’ (or in my case, ‘liking myself’ the choice, as always, is yours)! That’s the key, though. Don’t let anyone tell you you can’t be yourself and live a great life or at least, never have been!

If you’d like to explore other types of mindfulness, check out

Here is more of my writing

I hope you enjoyed this post and found some of my thoughts helpful!

This week on Mindfulness in Everyday Life I’m exploring mindfulness and learning how to incorporate it into your daily activities to help you be more present and get things done that matter to you.

In the meantime, here’s to a new year filled with love!

Happy New Year!

1/10 An ironing board was placed atop a table at the wedding venue in Lille, west of Paris, on Friday, September 15, after it was destroyed by a suspected gas leak. AP 2/10 A couple is supported by a photographer while they try to look for water on the shore at the beach in Lille, west of Paris, on Friday, September 15, after the beach was destroyed by a suspected gas leak. AP 3/10 The beach of Lille, eastern France, where couples were invited to picnic ahead of a traditional wedding on Friday. EPA 4/10 On September 15 a suspicious fire broke out at the beach-side community of Lille in the southern French city of Les Corts. A suspected gas leak forced the closure of the beach for the wedding party. Reuters 5/10 The beach was closed to the public, but residents were able to relax on the beach beach at Les Corts after a fire at the beach, reported AFP news agency. It is expected to continue into Sunday evening. Reuters 6/10 Firefighters were called to the scene at around 4:00am local time, which they quickly responded to investigate. EPA 7/10 The beach is closed to the public, but locals reportedly started to gather at the front of the line of cars waiting to access it, after the closure. Reuters 8/10 A man, his child (2nd from L), sleeping on a beach at Lille on 19 September, in a traditional bathing ritual. Reuters 9/10 The beach in Les Corts was closed to the public in the early hours of Friday morning, as authorities took precautionary measures to reassure people. AFP/Getty Images 10/10 On Monday morning, firefighters moved in at 5.45am after the beach was evacuated after a leak was detected. Le Monde

Mr Hollande condemned the incident while Mr de Gauck also voiced concern at the “hateful attack”.

“The attack was committed in a place where young men were gathered at a beach party to listen to music”

Additional reporting by agencies

At it’s earliest unveiling, the robot was armed with a robotic vacuum cleaner, three small hand tools and an orange plastic cup. The robot is so named due in part to a simple statement on the rear body, which reads “googly googly” (the slogan used on the top of its robot). The robotic arm was made by UK robotics company iRobot. The robot was originally designed to be an interesting addition to the Stop and Shop at locations across the United Kingdom but has since been found on every Stop and Shop within the United States. Each of the robots comes with built-in cameras, which allow it to follow customers’ every move. The robotic arm is completely wireless and is programmed to return to a clean store when it is done shopping.

The robot is so named due to a simple statement on the rear body, which reads “googly googly” (the slogan used on the top of its robot).

This year, the robot rolled out at the world-famous Stop & Shop in New York City. It’ll remain there until December 11.

Photo: iRobot

Each of the robotic arms comes preloaded with a clean and dry cleaning kit. The robot does not have a robot vacuum of its own like its human counterpart, but the robotic arm does come with a washing machine so customers can leave their messy clothing to catch up with the robot.

The robot can then be used as a helper and as a demonstration.

According to the Post-Crescent, construction might begin in fall 2015, with construction lasting six to 18 months. The Post-Crescent stated, “”The city wants to bring a big retailer that comes and delivers things to the area, and Amazon would be ideal, to give it easier access to Madison’s residents.” On June 26, the Post-Crescent said the city will present an 18-month lease plan to Amazon to determine if and the how many buildings are included in the contract. “The lease is supposed to be in place in two years or so and a contract would be in place in a little longer than that,” Mayor Paul Soglin said. The Post-Crescent’s coverage on the project and discussion of a possible contract is below:

Amazon is also looking to begin construction of the first Phase of what it says will be a first-of-its kind distribution center in the Midwest, according to the Post-Crescent and the Washington Post. Based on what’s being described, this would be similar to the one that recently opened in Kansas City, Kansas but instead would be in Madison, Wisconsin and is set to include 100,000 square feet of retail as well as a 12,000 square foot event center as well as other office and retail space. The development has been in the works for the last two years and should be completed in the first year of next year. According to the Post-Crescent, construction on the $70 million facility will start next year and include an 8,500 sq. ft. high-rise office building that will be built on an already constructed parking lot and a 40-acre agricultural site in the city.

According to the New York Times , Amazon intends to break ground on a new distribution center in September. The New York Times article talks about the development site as being “just a few miles away from its offices in Seattle,” and the Post-Crescent wrote that “the Amazon location is expected to allow employees to live a closer distance from shipping and distribution facilities and cut out costs for company workers.” To read the full New York Times article head to the Post-Crescent here .

The Madison Post-Crescent wrote that the Amazon lease for the distribution center could include one or two buildings at the site, with the other being a “secondary corporate office, such as an engineering and design firm to create the design process and other operations.” Other construction related projects also include a construction yard on the south shore, which could allow the building to house a warehouse that would also house shipping operations for the distribution company, the Post-Crescent wrote.

According to information posted on the blog, the site could also feature a restaurant to house local employees during work hours. The cost for the construction would be $40.7 million on an annual basis, plus a $1.5 million annual assessment by the city. For any comments or questions, leave them below.

He said that China remains one of the world’s leading surveillance operations, with a special focus on U.S. companies that build and operate U.S. networks. The U.S. does not release data or information about China’s efforts, he said.

If this was a government operation, then it shouldn’t have much of a place in the public debate, the commissioner said. The Commission oversees the nation’s communications, including telecommunications, and the privacy and civil liberties issues involved are well known in private, but now are taking center stage when it comes to the Commission.

Barry Schwartz, senior vice president of the wireless carrier Nextel, said: “In the United States, we’re not doing anything very unusual with our operations. At the same time I think it’s important that there is transparency.”

U.S. tech companies, including Nokia, Google, Facebook and Amazon, are part of a special U.S. government project to prevent the spread of hacking, the FCC’s Crawford said on Friday night in a speech at a telecommunications conference in Washington. “And you can see there are more countries – China, Russia, Taiwan, India – that are developing sophisticated cyber capabilities,” he said.

“… China has been one of the world leaders in cyber espionage and cyber-espionage for decades now. So why have they not gotten the same treatment from the United States?” he said.

In response to the commission’s speech, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce denounced the FCC’s stance and called it “irresponsible and an embarrassment.”

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now